Comparison of Hypoxia Between HFNC and SNC in Patient Undergoing UGI Endoscopic Procedures in Deep Sedation
NCT06482879 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 122
Last updated 2024-07-01
Summary
Hypoxia frequently occurs as a complication during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures performed under deep sedation. Traditional oxygen delivery methods, such as the simple nasal cannula, are commonly used to prevent hypoxia in these cases. The high-flow nasal cannula, capable of delivering FiO2 levels of up to 1 and flow rates of up to 70 l/min, offers additional benefits, including positive end-expiratory pressure and reduced dead space. We hypothesized is that the use of high-flow nasal cannula can decrease the incidence of hypoxia in comparison to simple nasal cannula in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures under deep sedation.
This was prospective, comparative observational study conducted in a tertiary care center of Nepal with the primary objective to compare the rates of hypoxia (SpO2 \< 92%) and secondary objectives were to compare interruption of procedure due to hypoxia, minimum hypoxia level and episodes of hypoxia between high flow nasal canula (flow rate of 30l/min with FiO2 of 0.5) and simple nasal canula (flow rate of 6l/min) in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures in semi-prone position in deep sedation using propofol infusion.
The study comprised 125 participants, 58 in simple nasal canula and 67 in high flow nasal cannula group. The incidence of hypoxia in simple nasal cannula and high flow nasal cannula groups, with rates of 37.3% (22/58) and 16.4% (11/67), respectively. The relative risk (RR) of hypoxia was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.81), with a p-value of 0.009. Procedural interruptions due to hypoxia occurred in 8.6% (5/58) of participants in the simple nasal cannula group and 4.47% (3/67) in the high flow nasal cannula group, with RR of 0.17 (95% CI: 0.02-1.41) and a p-value 0.1. Furthermore, the occurrence of multiple episodes of hypoxia was higher in the simple nasal cannula group compared to the high flow nasal cannula group (5 vs. 0), with a p-value \< 0.001.The use of high flow nasal cannula reduces the occurrence of hypoxia in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with deep sedation compared to simple nasal cannula.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Oxygen delivery
Oxygen is delivered with high flow nasal canula or simple nasal canula to prevent hypoxia during procedures under deep sedation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Academy of Medical Sciences, Nepal
lead OTHER_GOV
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-15
- Completion
- 2024-02-20
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Nepal
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of New Oropharyngeal Airway on Incidence of Hypoxia During Painless Gastroenteroscopy in Elderly Patients
NCT06711328 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
SJOV vs. HFNO for Hypoxia During Procedural Sedation at High Altitudes
NCT05474287 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wei Nasal Jet Tube vs Nasal Cannula Oxygen Support in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Patients
NCT05783050 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Laryngoscopic View to Enable GlideScope-assisted Tracheal Intubation
NCT02144207 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00400972 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improve Oxygenation and Capnographic Detection During Sedative EGD
NCT03138850 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Development of an Algorithm to Denoise HFNO-generated Tracheal Sound
NCT06218017 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Performance of Two Oxygen Delivery Devices Used After General Anesthesia.
NCT01917526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prevalence of Major Vessels Underlying the Potential Incision Site for Emergency Front of Neck Airway Access in Adult Surgical Patients With Impalpable Neck Anatomy
NCT06637319 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Cervical Injury
NCT05619965 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
King Vision® and GlideScope® in Difficult Airways
NCT03685968 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Flow Nasal Oxygenation and Gastric Insufflation in Anesthetized Patients
NCT04629911 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between VCV and FCV Through Ultra-thin Tube in Upper Airway Surgery
NCT05033730 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endotracheal Intubation Using Macintosh Laryngoscope, Glidescope, Airwayscope During Chest Compression With Adjustment Height of a Bed
NCT02074098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Airway Management During Deep Sedation in Hysteroscopy
NCT05701839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Determining the Depth of Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT02158247 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Videolaryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for the Awake Intubation
NCT02169232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
WEI NASAL JET for The Sedation of Outpatient Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
NCT02436018 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Disposcope Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope
NCT02669550 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Cuff Inflation-supplemented Videoscope-guided Nasal Intubation
NCT03136549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Face-to-face Tracheal Intubation: a Comparison of Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach
NCT02286570 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Different Tools Inserted Nasal Endotracheal Tube
NCT02448277 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
NCT02482870 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope
NCT01814176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA