MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Anatomic Results Between Bilateral and Conventional Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy

NCT02667002 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2022-03-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Investigators separated 20 patients with uterovaginal prolapse into 2 groups according to random numbers table. In one group, conventional abdominal sacral hysteropexy will be perform and another group bilateral abdominal sacral hysteropexy will be perform with polypropylene mesh. After 1 mont operation vaginal configuration will be evaluate with MRI on three plane (axial, sagittal, coronal). Then the results of thus two groups will be compare to results of nullipara patients. Investigators will investigate which technique keep the vaginal axis is closer to the original anatomic position.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Bilateral Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy

The mesh will be fixed right and left side of sacrum.

PROCEDURE

Conventional abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy

The mesh will be fixed only right side of sacrum

OTHER

Nulliparous women with no uterovaginal prolapsed

This will be control group which consistent patients with no uterovaginal prolapse.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mehmet Baki Şentürk, MD · Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-11-30
Primary Completion
2017-05-31
Completion
2017-06-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02667002 on ClinicalTrials.gov