MedTrace Logo

3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for Hysterectomy

NCT04070872 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 68

Last updated 2019-08-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes and efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) versus 2-dimensional (2D) imaging systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Conditions

  • Laparoscopy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

3D laparoscope

For laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm ENDOEYE FLEX 3D Deflectable Videoscope (Olympus Corp., Germany) was used in the 3D group.

PROCEDURE

2D laparoscope

For laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm 30º IDEAL EYES Laparoscope (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) camera was used in the 2D group.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Taejong Song, MD PhD · Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-08-23
Primary Completion
2019-08-23
Completion
2019-08-23

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04070872 on ClinicalTrials.gov