MedTrace Logo

Ultrasonic Versus Monopolar Energy-based Surgical Device in Colpotomy

NCT02729272 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2019-04-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the degree of surgical smoke obstructing vision and thermal damage caused by two different ESDs (ultrasonic versus monopolar ESD) in colpotomy during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Conditions

  • Gynecologic Diseases

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic colpotomy by ultrasonic ESD

In this intervention, laparoscopic colpotomy was performed by ultrasonic ESD (Harmonic Synergy Hook Blades; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA).

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic colpotomy by monopolar ESD

In this intervention, laparoscopic colpotomy was performed by monopolar ESD (hook electrode with 90 watts of unmodulated current; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany).

DEVICE

Monopolar ESD

DEVICE

Ultrasonic ESD

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Taejong Song, MD,PhD · Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-04-30
Primary Completion
2017-04-30
Completion
2017-04-30

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02729272 on ClinicalTrials.gov