Cold Snare Polypectomy of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Adenomas
NCT03859479 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2019-03-06
Summary
A prospective randomised controlled trial of cold vs hot snare polypectomy of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas.
Conditions
- Colorectal Polyp
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Cold snare polypectomy
After a target polyp was identified, it should be placed at the comfortable position. Then the snare will be opened and encircled the polyp without air aspiration. Then, the snare will be captured the polyp with at least 1-2 mm of surrounding normal tissue. The polyp will be guillotined and would not be lifted or tented until complete closure is achieved. After resection, the mucosal defect the marginal mucosa was carefully observed, with used of magnification and image enhancement. If residual polyp tissue was recognised, additional removal using the cold snare technique or biopsy forceps will be performed. If a submucosal injection prior to snaring was necessary it will be permitted. After polypectomy all patients will be observed for 3-4 days in-hospital
- PROCEDURE
-
Hot snare polypectomy
After a target polyp was identified, it should be placed at the comfortable position. Then the polyp with minimal normal tissue will be captured by the snare. The ensnared polyp should be tented away from the colonic wall and removed by one the types of electric currents. After resection, the mucosal defect will be washed thoroughly and the marginal mucosa was carefully observed, with used of magnification and image enhancement, such as near focus imaging or narrow band imaging. If a submucosal injection prior to snaring was necessary it would be permitted. If residual polyp tissue was recognised, additional removal using coagulation or biopsy forceps will be performed. After polypectomy all patients will be observed for 3-4 days in-hospital
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology, Russian Federation
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-20
- Primary Completion
- 2021-08-30
- Completion
- 2021-08-31
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Colonography Versus Colonoscopy in High Risk Patient
NCT00748449 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03470142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Colon Cancer Surgery in the Aged; Postoperative Outcome, Functional Recovery and Survival.
NCT03904121 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer
NCT04559087 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05740267 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04853784 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Short-term Outcomes of Full Bowel Preparation (MBP+OA) for Colon Cancer Resections Versus no Bowel Preparation
NCT05546892 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic vs Laparoscopic D3-D4 Lymphadenectomy for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05961423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Preoperative Assessment for Synchronous Carcinoma or Polyps With Magnetic Resonance (MR) Colonography
NCT00300547 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Impact of a Patient Decision Aid on Treatment Choices for Patients With an Unexpected Malignant Colorectal Polyp
NCT05776381 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Efficacy Of Complete Mesocolic Excision With Central Vessel Ligation Technique On Lymph Nodes And Safety Margins Compared With Conventional Surgery For Colon Cancer Treatment
NCT04079946 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Using Low-pressure Combined With Warm and Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation
NCT05934981 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Interruption Versus Continuous Anticoagulation in Colorectal Polypectomy
NCT07185295 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Transrectal Specimen Extraction for Colon Cancer
NCT06362902 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Status and Quality of Life in Older Patients Undergoing Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05848609 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Enteral Stents for Colonic Obstruction
NCT00591695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of NOSE and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Total Colon Surgery
NCT03499769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fast Track Laparoscopic Surgery: A Better Option for Treating Colorectal Cancer Than Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01969591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Transanal Endoscopy Rectosigmoid Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01340755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection vs Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT06462521 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Laparoscopic With Open Gastric Cancer Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT02748551 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Assessment of Autologous Blood Marker Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT05597384 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Study of Totally Laparoscopic Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) for Rectosigmoid Cancer
NCT02635503 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3