Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 600
Last updated 2005-12-20
Summary
The laparoscopic colectomy has been enthusiastically used by many colorectal surgeons in Taiwan, Japan, Europe, and USA, for around 10 years. Further clarification of the controversies cited above will be based on the evidence-based medicine, i.e., the randomized, well-controlled, prospective clinical trials. Actually, a handful of randomized prospective data regarding the laparoscopic colectomy has been appeared in USA and Europe. However, we still do not have this kind of data in Taiwan, and therefore this study is important and mandatory.
In this project, we assumed that a difference in cancer-related survival of less then 15% between treatments indicates an equivalent efficacy. Assuming a 70% 5-year, cancer-related survival of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients in the open colectomy group, a minimum of 100 patients per group was required to showed that both surgical techniques were equivalent with an α-level of 0.20 and a β error of 0.05. Only patients with stage II and III disease undergoing curative resection will be enrolled onto this study. The patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment group by block randomization method. Postoperatively, the patients will be prospectively evaluated regarding the following parameters including operative stress, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum interleukin-6, WBC counts and classification, CD-4 to CD-8 ratio, postoperative life quality, such as wound size, degree of pain, time to have flatus passage and feeding, time to resume daily activity and work, and the oncological outcomes, such as recurrence patterns of tumor, and 5-year patient survival. The evaluation of above-mentioned parameters will be single-blindly done by our research assistant, who has no idea of both surgical techniques. We hope this study will promote the level of surgical research in Taiwan.
Conditions
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Taiwan University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jin-Tung Liang, M.D., Ph.D. · Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, TAIWAN, R.O.C.
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2000-01-31
- Completion
- 2005-07-31
Countries
- Taiwan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Trial for Single Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy
NCT01101672 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00147134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Surgery Equivalent to Open Surgery in Right Colon Cancer Surgery?
NCT01772407 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04853784 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Colectomy for Cancer in the Elderly by Laparoscopy or Laparotomy
NCT03033719 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Versus Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
NCT02682589 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Surgery for T4 Tumor of the Colon Cancer
NCT02852915 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03470142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma
NCT00485316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Operations for Colon Cancer
NCT00202111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-Center Randomised Controlled Study to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00788281 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic vs Laparoscopic D3-D4 Lymphadenectomy for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05961423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Multicenter Clinical Trial on Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery Compared With Open Surgery
NCT02248038 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Conventional Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer
NCT00003354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Outcome of Resection for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03837782 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Transrectal Specimen Extraction for Colon Cancer
NCT06362902 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03633539 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multivisceral Radical Resection for Surgical T4b Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-matched Study Comparing the the Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
NCT05707598 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Three-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03426514 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fast Track Laparoscopic Surgery: A Better Option for Treating Colorectal Cancer Than Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01969591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients
NCT01862562 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Trends and Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT03683446 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multicenter Single-port Colectomy RCT
NCT01480128 ·Status: APPROVED_FOR_MARKETING