Comparison of NOSES and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer
NCT04559087 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2020-09-22
Summary
Radical surgery for rectal cancer has evolved from the initial concept of total mesorctal excision (TME) to the wide application of laparoscopic surgery in the radical treatment of rectal cancer. After 30 years' rapid development, nowdays laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer has become the first choice for those patients with rectal cancer. However, the auxiliary incision of the abdominal wall which is used to remove tumor specimens is contrary to the current concept of minimally invasive surgery. Avoiding abdominal wall incisions has become a common appeal of gastrointestinal surgeons and patients with rectal cancer. Natural orififice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) can solve the problem of abdominal wall auxiliary incision, which complete rectal cancer radical resection and gastrointestinal reconstruction under the full laparoscopic. The specimens are taken out through the natural orifice (rectum or vagina) without an auxiliary incision, which is more in line with minimally invasive practice and easier to operate. Researching on the progress of laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in NOSES aims to provide a certain reference for this operation.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic Surgery
NOSES:Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is the opening of a hollow viscus that already communicates with the outside world, such as the vagina or distal gastrointestinal tract, in order to remove a specimen. The premise of this technique is to reduce the trauma required to remove the specimen with the expectation that this may improve outcomes. Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery:Surgical specimens were taken out through abdominal wall.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Zunyi Medical College
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-04-30
- Completion
- 2022-04-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety Study of Totally Laparoscopic Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) for Rectosigmoid Cancer
NCT02635503 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT04527861 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bacteriological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201872 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04481659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Robotic Top-down Intersphincteric Resection
NCT05961969 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Elderly
NCT05563441 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multivisceral Radical Resection for Surgical T4b Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-matched Study Comparing the the Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
NCT05707598 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colorectal Surgery- A Multiple Center Real World Study
NCT05911152 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Trial of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT02673177 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03633539 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05740267 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endolaparoscopic Versus Immediate Surgery for Obstructing Colorectal Cancers
NCT00164879 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Multi-Center Randomised Controlled Study to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00788281 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Performing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Outside the Primary Registered Medical Institution
NCT04834661 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Underwater Resection for Colorectal Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions
NCT03021135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Surgery for T4 Tumor of the Colon Cancer
NCT02852915 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study of Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy Using the Caudal-to-cranial Approach
NCT02949440 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Versus Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
NCT02682589 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Two Types of Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00007930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED