Safety Study of Totally Laparoscopic Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) for Rectosigmoid Cancer
NCT02635503 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 366
Last updated 2016-09-02
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
transrectal specimen extraction
After mobilization of bowel and dissection of lymph nodes, a cross clamp was placed distal to the tumor. Distal rectum was transected after fully disinfecting rectal lumen by 10% povidone-iodine. An anvil head attached to circular stapling device was put into abdominal cavity through rectal stump, and put into colon lumen through a longitudinal incision, then the proximal colon was transected in close proximity to the upper pole of incision by a linear stapling device. During specimen extraction though the rectum, a disposable sterile protective cover was used to avoid cancer cell exfoliation and implantation. The rectal opening was reclosed by a linear stapler. End-to-end colorectal anastomosis was performed with a circular stapler using the double-stapling technique.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional laparoscopic surgery
High ligation of inferior mesenteric vessel , mobilization of bowel, and dissection of lymph nodes were performed laparoscopically, and total mesorectal excision with nerve-sparing technique was followed for rectal cancer. Conventional laparoscopic-assisted surgery (CLS), a small incision with a 3-7cm length was made in hypogastrium, transection of rectum was completed through abdominal incision, then the specimen was removed and the bowel was prepared for anastomosis. The anastomosis for all rectal cancer and most of sigmoid colon cancer was performed by a double-stapling technique following open resection.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Zhixiang Zhou, M.D. · Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2020-12-31
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Transvaginal NOSES Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Right Hemicolectomy
NCT05495048 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery for Carcinoma of the Low Rectum
NCT01899547 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopy NOSE for Stage I-III Left-sided Colon Cancer
NCT05970133 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00007930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision for Colorectal Neoplasms
NCT05690490 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Top-down Intersphincteric Resection
NCT05961969 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in Elderly
NCT05563441 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colorectal Surgery- A Multiple Center Real World Study
NCT05911152 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Multivisceral Radical Resection for Surgical T4b Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-matched Study Comparing the the Laparoscopic and Open Approaches
NCT05707598 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Extraction-site, - Midline Incision vs Off-midline Incision-
NCT02253303 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Transanal Endoscopy Rectosigmoid Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01340755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04481659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT00470951 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Short-term Outcomes of Day Surgery for Patients With CuRC
NCT04646915 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Fast Track Laparoscopic Surgery: A Better Option for Treating Colorectal Cancer Than Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01969591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT03633539 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Underwater Resection for Colorectal Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions
NCT03021135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection With Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer.
NCT02468362 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Cold and Hot Loop Resection Techniques for the Removal of Medium-sized Benign Colon Tumors
NCT07041255 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Between Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in Transverse and Descending Colon Cancer Patients
NCT01861691 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2