Non-invasive Ventilation vs Oxygen Therapy After Extubation Failure

NCT03832387 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 77

Last updated 2019-06-04

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has not exhibited a reduction of reintubation after extubation failure compared to oxygen therapy. The reduction of reintubation with NIV versus oxygen therapy in patients with extubation failure was evaluated.

A clinical trial was conducted that included patients who underwent mechanical ventilation and developed acute respiratory failure after extubation. After extubation failure, thirty-three were assigned to NIV and thirty-two were assigned to oxygen therapy.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation

DEVICE

Continuous positive airway pressure

DEVICE

Venturi mask

DEVICE

Reservoir mask

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • ALBERTO BELENGUER MUNCHARAZ · HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO CASTELLON

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-03-29
Primary Completion
2016-06-04
Completion
2016-09-04

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03832387 on ClinicalTrials.gov