MedTrace Logo

Double-lumen Tubes (DLT) - Health Economic Study

NCT03817879 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2020-02-13

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of this study is to make a health economic evaluation comparing novice physicians use of VivaSight double-lumen tube and a conventional double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery at a teaching hospital. The hypothesis is, that both double-lumen tubes are equally cost-effective and the the incidence of fiberoptic bronchoscope use it the same for both tubes.

Conditions

  • Single Lung Ventilation
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Anesthesia
  • Cost-effectiveness

Interventions

PROCEDURE

VivaSight double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation

Procedure using a tube with a camera

PROCEDURE

Conventional double-lument tube for single-lung ventilation

Procedure using a tube without a camera

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ambu A/S

    lead INDUSTRY

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-11-02
Primary Completion
2019-01-31
Completion
2019-01-31

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03817879 on ClinicalTrials.gov