MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between a Standard Tube and the Ultra-thin Tritube for Intubation of the Trachea and for Maintaining Access to the Trachea After Anaesthesia, in Patients With an Expected Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy

NCT03653039 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48

Last updated 2024-02-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators compare the ease of intubation between a new ultra-thin endotracheal tube, "Tritube", and a standard endotracheal tube in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. Furthermore the investigators compare the acceptance of leaving the Tritube in trachea after end of anaesthesia, with the use of a tube exchange catheter.

Conditions

  • Oral Neoplasm
  • Pharynx Cancer
  • Larynx Cancer

Interventions

DEVICE

Tritube

The ultra thin tribute is used used for the ventilation of the patients in this arm

DEVICE

Standard enditracheal tube

A standard endotracheal tube is used used for the ventilation of the patients in this arm

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Michael Seltz Kristensen

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Michael S Kristensen, MD · Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen Denmark

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-09-12
Primary Completion
2019-02-14
Completion
2019-02-14

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03653039 on ClinicalTrials.gov