MedTrace Logo

Conventional Double-lumen Tube vs VivaSight DL

NCT02741921 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 27

Last updated 2016-04-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.

Conditions

  • Endotracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

VivaSight DL

intubation using VivaSight DL tube

DEVICE

conventional double-lumen tube

intubation using conventional double-lumen tube

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Warsaw

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-11-30
Primary Completion
2016-03-31
Completion
2016-03-31

Countries

  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02741921 on ClinicalTrials.gov