A Comparison the Intubation of a Left Sided Double Lumen Tube and Uniblocker

NCT03392922 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2019-01-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is required for the most thoracic surgery to facilitate surgical visualization by collapsing the lung. The double-lumen tube (DLT) and Uniblocker are the commonly used device for OLV.The objective of our study was to comparison the safety and effectiveness of the intubation of the Left-sided Double-lumen Tube and the Uniblocker under the guidence of chest computed tomography (CT) image.

Conditions

  • Therapeutic Procedural Complication

Interventions

DEVICE

Uniblocker

The BBs have more advantages than DLT: easier insertion especially in patients with difficult airway18 and no need to exchange the tube when mechanical ventilation is required after surgery.

DEVICE

Left-sided Double-lumen Tube

the double-lumen tube (DLT) is the most commonly used device for OLV

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Ximing Qi · The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-06
Primary Completion
2018-05-12
Completion
2018-06-25

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03392922 on ClinicalTrials.gov