Polypectomy With Hot vs Cold Snare in Small Colonic Lesions
NCT03783156 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300
Last updated 2020-05-13
Summary
Colonoscopy is the technique of choice for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). The identification and extirpation of adenomas decreases the incidence of CRC by up to 76%. More than 70% of the excised lesions are less than 10 mm. There is controversy about the technique to be used (resection with cold vs hot snare) in lesions of 5-9mm. Both use a polypectomy snare. The cold snare cuts by friction, while the hot snare uses electrical current. We propose a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing both endoscopic techniques. At least 394 injuries per group will be included, randomizing patients to whom a diagnostic colonoscopy is requested for symptoms, screening or revision protocols. Randomization will be performed stratified by center. The primary objective is the proportion of incomplete polypectomies, which will be analyzed centrally from random biopsies of the edges of the lesion. As secondary objectives, we will compare the proportion of immediate and delayed hemorrhagic complications, the evolution of postprocedural abdominal pain and the factors associated with incomplete excision in each group and the factors associated with a failed cold polypectomy. The analysis of the primary objective will be carried out by means of the z test of homogeneity without using the correction of Yates, estimating the confidence interval of the difference between both groups. The analysis will be carried out by intention to treat and per protocol.
Conditions
- Polyp of Colon
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- Colonic Adenoma
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
hot snare
polypectomy with hot snare
- PROCEDURE
-
cold snare
polypectomy with cold snare
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospital del Rio Hortega
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Marina de Benito, MD · Hospital Río Hortega
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-02-18
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-31
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effectiveness of an Exclusive Cold Snare Polypectomy Snare for the Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02036047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy
NCT03501849 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT01646242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
NCT04727918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare,Hot Snare and APC Polypectomy for the Complete Removal of Small Left Sided Colon Polyps
NCT02479893 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT04232176 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Cold Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents
NCT01553565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps
NCT03647176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT03373136 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT02476747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions
NCT04418843 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improving Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT01471756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Injured Submucosal Arteries After CSP for 10-19 mm Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps.
NCT05930041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surveillance Intervals After Piecemeal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions ≥20mm
NCT06791616 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques
NCT02208401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of EMR-P With Conventional EMR
NCT04191473 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT06271941 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Research of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of 4-9 mm Diameter Colorectal 0-Isp and 0-Ip Polyps: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study(FAST -REST Study)
NCT06658561 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (C-EMR) Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (H-EMR) for Large Colorectal Polyps (10-20 mm)
NCT06180798 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Prophylactic Clip and Detachable Snare
NCT01406379 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA