MedTrace Logo

Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps

NCT06937047 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 196

Last updated 2025-04-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This was a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps. The primary outcome was delayed postpolypectomy bleeding. The secondary outcomes included immediate postpolypectomy bleeding, procedure time, en bloc resection, complete histologic resection, use of haemostatic clips and perforation rate.

Conditions

  • Colorectal Polyps

Interventions

PROCEDURE

cold snare polypectomy

Cold snare polypectomy was conducted for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps.

PROCEDURE

hot snare polypectomy

Hot snare polypectomy was conducted for the removal of 4-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shandong University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-05-06
Primary Completion
2027-01-01
Completion
2027-02-28

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06937047 on ClinicalTrials.gov