Surveillance Intervals After Piecemeal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Lesions ≥20mm
NCT06791616 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 746
Last updated 2025-01-24
Summary
Intensive endoscopic surveillance following piecemeal resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions (NPCL) ≥20 mm is the current standard of care, given the high recurrence rate of these lesions (15-30%). However, most recurrences are detected at 12 months, are small and unifocal, and can be easily resected endoscopically. Furthermore, thermal margin ablation has demonstrated a reduction in recurrence rates to 5-6%, highlighting the need to optimize current surveillance protocols, which are costly, invasive, and impose a significant clinical burden.
The multicenter SCARFACE clinical trial aims to evaluate whether a reduced surveillance protocol (at 12 and 48 months) is non-inferior to the standard protocol (at 6, 12, and 48 months) in terms of recurrence rates, using a predefined non-inferiority margin. This non-inferiority design aims to determine if the reduced protocol maintains acceptable efficacy while reducing clinical workload and minimizing risks and discomfort associated with intensive follow-up.
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the two surveillance protocols, with an estimated sample size of 746 lesions. The primary objective is to compare the cumulative incidence of recurrence at 12 months. Secondary objectives include characterizing recurrences, assessing complications associated with endoscopic treatments and evaluating the incidence of advanced colorectal lesions. The findings of this study are expected to directly impact clinical guidelines and routine practice, optimizing resource utilization and improving patient quality of life.
Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Adenoma Colon
- Colonic Polyps
- Serrated Adenoma
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- Non-pedunculated Lesions
- Thermal Ablation
- Recurrence
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Colonoscopy
Surveillance colonoscopy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante
collaborator NETWORK -
Asociación Española de Gastroenterología
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-05-31
- Completion
- 2030-05-31
More Related Trials
-
Endoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
NCT04780256 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Outcomes of the Endoscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Gastrointestinal Lesions
NCT01750619 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Surveillance in Serrated Polyposis Syndrome and Low-risk of Advanced Neoplasia
NCT04906343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Early Colorectal Neoplasms
NCT01112046 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT01646242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT07314554 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Recurrence Rate After Endoscopic Resection of , Laterally Spreading Tumor Granular Type (LST-G) of the Colon and Rectum: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
NCT06815406 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps
NCT03647176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02678663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Factors for Residual Neoplasia After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT01478919 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Polypectomy With Hot vs Cold Snare in Small Colonic Lesions
NCT03783156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions
NCT04418843 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improving Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT01471756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Laterally Spreading Lesions.
NCT04593407 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Accuracy of Human Endoscopic Detection of Submucosal Invasive Cancer in Colorectal Polyps
NCT05191095 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cold Snare,Hot Snare and APC Polypectomy for the Complete Removal of Small Left Sided Colon Polyps
NCT02479893 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps
NCT04061005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Full Spectrum vs. Standard Forward-viewing Colonoscopy
NCT02117674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Follow-up Protocol of Colorectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Scars
NCT04239365 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Routine Submucosal Injection Improve Complete Resection of 4-20 mm Neoplastic Colorectal Polyps?
NCT04548947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Efficacy
NCT01879904 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA