Comparison of EMR-P With Conventional EMR
NCT04191473 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 220
Last updated 2020-06-11
Summary
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common cancer in women.There are about 14 million cases of colonoscopy in the United States every year. In recent years, the incidence of colorectal cancer in China has risen sharply, becoming a serious threat to people's health.For small(≤ 9mm) lesions, endoscopic biopsy forceps and cold snare polypectomy can be used to remove.For larger lesions, especially laterally spreading tumor,endoscopic mucosal resection is a classic method of treatment.With the increasing diameter of the lesion size(\> 20mm),we also need to adopt endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection.
As IT, Hook knife, BB, and other devices appear constantly, foreign researchers recently adopted a variation of conventional EMR(CEMR), namely endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting(EMR - P).The technology is superior to conventional EMR for 10 to 20 mm polyps.Moreover, preliminary studies suggest that it has good safety and efficacy, and may be a better method for treatment of 10-20mm polyps under colonoscopy.
This clinical trial is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of two methods of polypectomy, CEMR and EMR-P, for 10-20mm colorectal polyps.
Conditions
- Colonic Polyp
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
EMR-P
After submucosal injection, we use ESD knife or the tip of the entrapment device to loop around the lesion, and then overlapped the loop tangent with the entrapment device. After tightening the entrapment device, all the tumor tissues were confirmed to enter the entrapment device, and the tissues were removed.
- PROCEDURE
-
CEMR
A liquid pad was formed by injecting 0.9% normal saline with meilan solution into submucosa,and then overlapped the loop tangent with the entrapment device. After tightening the entrapment device, all the tumor tissues were confirmed to enter the entrapment device, and the tissues were removed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-10-01
- Completion
- 2020-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Precut-EMR for Resecting of Colonic Polyp
NCT04253990 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR for Medium-sized Pedunculated Colon Polyps
NCT04837690 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
UEMR vs. CEMR for Diminutive Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT03833492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (C-EMR) Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (H-EMR) for Large Colorectal Polyps (10-20 mm)
NCT06180798 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Repeated Colonoscopic Insert Method on the Detection Rate of Adenomas in the Sigmoid Colon
NCT06186778 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps
NCT04061005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps
NCT03647176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Metal Clips With Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Big Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06097637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05825664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold or Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10-19mm Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05545787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR Versus HSP in the Treatment of Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Less Than 10mm in Size
NCT06996522 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Web-Mediated Risk Assessment for Endoscopic Screening of Colorectal Polyps
NCT03750617 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Research of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of 4-9 mm Diameter Colorectal 0-Isp and 0-Ip Polyps: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study(FAST -REST Study)
NCT06658561 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small Colorectal Polyp Removal Using Cold EMR With Hot EMR
NCT03000868 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study on the Accuracy of Real-time AI-assisted Endocytoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Diminutive Polyps
NCT06791408 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Using Regular or Rotary Polypectomy Snare for the Resection of Colorectal Polyps
NCT03608930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Real-time AI-assisted Endocyroscopy for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Lesions
NCT06791395 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02678663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes After EMR or ESD of Colorectal Neoplasms - A Multicenter Registry
NCT05653960 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Adenoma Detection Rate Using Endocuff Vision in China
NCT03839277 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: NA