Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 196
Last updated 2025-07-24
Summary
Endoscopic resection of pedunculated polyps mainly focuses on how to prevent bleeding, and also needs to pay attention to the convenience of resection and the integrity of resection, which means that different endoscopic resection strategies should be adopted for pedunculated polyps with different stalk sizes. Small pedunculated polyps with heads smaller than 20mm and stalks less than or equal to 5mm are defined as having a relatively small risk of bleeding. Preliminary studies in recent years suggest that the use of cold snare polypectomy for small pedunculated polyps may also be a safe resection strategy. However, for small pedunculated polyps, ASGE and ESGE guidelines currently recommend hot snare polypectomy in the middle and lower pedicles (evidence level medium). Therefore, the provision of high-quality clinical evidence related to cold resection techniques in the resection strategy of small pedunculated polyps may provide a basis for revision of guidelines.
Conditions
- Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
- Haemorrhage
Interventions
- OTHER
-
cold snare polypectomy
Histological analyses suggest that cold snare polypectomy causes less damage to blood vessels in the submucosal layers, which results in a reduced incidence of hemorrhage
- OTHER
-
hot snare polypectomy
According to current clinical guidelines, hot snare polypectomy is the recommended standard technique for the resection of pedunculated colorectal polyps.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ninghai Second Hospital
collaborator UNKNOWN -
The People's Hospital of Yuyao City
collaborator UNKNOWN -
The Third People's Hospital Health Care Group of Cixi
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-10-18
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-15
- Completion
- 2025-06-15
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Comparison of Cold Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Taking Antithrombotic Agents
NCT01553565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Bowel Polyps in Patients With Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome
NCT06001476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
NBI-NearFocus Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Improves the Complete Resection Rate of Small Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Single-arm Observational Study
NCT06601426 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.
NCT04451512 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Efficacy and Safety Research of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of 4-9 mm Diameter Colorectal 0-Isp and 0-Ip Polyps: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study(FAST -REST Study)
NCT06658561 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR Versus HSP in the Treatment of Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Less Than 10mm in Size
NCT06996522 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing 10-20 mm 0-Ip Colorectal Polyp
NCT07114380 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05825664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02678663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT07314554 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps
NCT04061005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold or Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10-19mm Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05545787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT03373136 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small Colorectal Polyp Removal Using Cold EMR With Hot EMR
NCT03000868 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR vs. CEMR for Diminutive Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT03833492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps
NCT03647176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of an Exclusive Cold Snare Polypectomy Snare for the Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02036047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy
NCT01950117 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT02476747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR for Medium-sized Pedunculated Colon Polyps
NCT04837690 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques
NCT02208401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Using Regular or Rotary Polypectomy Snare for the Resection of Colorectal Polyps
NCT03608930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injured Submucosal Arteries After CSP for 10-19 mm Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps.
NCT05930041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA