Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques
NCT02208401 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 112
Last updated 2014-08-13
Summary
Different modalities are employed to remove small colonic polyps which potentially harbour a cancer risk. But, they can all vary in their completeness of removal, safety and the histological quality and the gold standard technique has yet to be defined. A novel suction pseudopolyp technique has been described by Patullo et al and in their prospective study, 126 polyps measuring less than 10mm flat or sessile were removed by this method with 100% complete endoscopic resection and without any immediate or delayed complications. The aim of the investigators study is to compare this technique with the standard cold snare technique. Patients attending for a routine colonoscopy and found to have polyps measuring 37mm in size will be eligible and they will be randomised to the polypectomy technique. Patient demographics and polyp characteristics will be recorded. The primary outcome measured will be the macroscopic resection rate. The secondary outcome measures are abdominal pain, tenderness, bleeding and fever.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
conventional cold snare polypectomy
conventional cold snare polypectomy
- PROCEDURE
-
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Cold snare polypectomy with suction
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Shawinder Johal, MBChB, PhD, MRCP · Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-08-31
- Completion
- 2014-08-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Value of Polyp Surface Pattern Recognition in the Identification of Neoplasia: a Prospective Study
NCT01182623 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cold Polypectomy Site Study
NCT02205125 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Injection-Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02678663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.
NCT04451512 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cold Snare,Hot Snare and APC Polypectomy for the Complete Removal of Small Left Sided Colon Polyps
NCT02479893 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Circumferential Submucosal Incision Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps
NCT01369316 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02484079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT07314554 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Sessile Serrated Polyps
NCT02967107 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Full Spectrum vs. Standard Forward-viewing Colonoscopy
NCT02117674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
NCT04727918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Research of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of 4-9 mm Diameter Colorectal 0-Isp and 0-Ip Polyps: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study(FAST -REST Study)
NCT06658561 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Predictors of Unsuccessful Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Complex Colon Polyps
NCT02782793 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT04232176 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective, Randomized, Parallel Clinical Controlled Study of Early Diet Opening on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Patients With Colonic Polyps
NCT05466903 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polypectomy With Hot vs Cold Snare in Small Colonic Lesions
NCT03783156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
NBI-NearFocus Assisted Cold Snare Polypectomy Improves the Complete Resection Rate of Small Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Single-arm Observational Study
NCT06601426 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT03373136 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Bowel Polyps in Patients With Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome
NCT06001476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cold Snare Versus Cold Forceps Polypectomy for Small Lesions
NCT06970808 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Metal Clips With Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Big Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06097637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biopsy Forceps Versus Cold Snare for the Resection of Small Colonic Polyps
NCT02239549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA