AuraGain and iGel Crossover Comparison
NCT02644837 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2
Last updated 2017-12-26
Summary
This study will look at key performance indicators of 2 supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetised adults in a crossover manner.
Conditions
- Airway Management
- Laryngeal Mask Airway
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Insertion of Ambu AuraGain laryngeal mask airway and Igel
Insertion of Ambu AuraGain and iGel laryngeal mask airways in accordance with manufacturer instruction
- DEVICE
-
Fibreoptic assessment with Ambu A-scope
Passage of Ambu a-scope fibrescope down shaft of laryngeal mask airway and assessment of alignment with glottis in relation to amount of glottis that is easily visualised
- DEVICE
-
Ability to insert nasogastric tube
Passage of nasogastric tube down the gastric drainage channel of the device in accordance with manufacturer guidance
- DEVICE
-
Measurement of OLP
Measurement of OLP by closing the adjustable pressure limiting valve against a constant fresh gas flow rate of 3 litres/minute
- DEVICE
-
Ability to perform positive pressure ventilation
The ability to deliver 6 mls/kg volumes breaths by means of positive pressure ventilation will be assessed
- DEVICE
-
Assessment of ease of insertion
Ease of insertion will be subjectively assessed by operator in relation to presence and nature of resistance to insertion of the device
- DEVICE
-
Record number of manipulations
The number of manipulations/adjustments will be recorded for the second device only for the remainder of the device use during surgery until the patient wakes.
- DEVICE
-
Assessment of device related trauma
Observation and assessment of any trauma caused by the insertion of the first device used
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
NHS Tayside
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Simon M Crawley, MBChB FRCA · Consultant Anaesthetist
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-05-31
- Completion
- 2017-08-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT05347680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The New Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable
NCT02884843 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Two Supraglottic Airway Devices (Ambu AuraGain vs Air Q-3) in Terms of Performance Characteristics.
NCT06914453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Ambu® AuraGain™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Adult
NCT03544749 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Three Supraglottic Airway Devices ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGain
NCT04045899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain, LarySeal Pro and I-gel in Pediatric Airway Management for Day-Case Surgery Under Controlled Ventilation
NCT07274280 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Between Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway and Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03130413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Efficiency of Three Third-generation Supraglottic Airways as an Intubation Route
NCT02975466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu Aura-i Laryngeal Mask Versus Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway for Tracheal Intubation in Adults
NCT02226211 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
RCT:Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) - Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme
NCT02816463 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask Airway and I-gel in Children
NCT03118245 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of the Neck Extension on Blind Intubation Via Ambu® AuraGain™
NCT03408431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGainTM and I-Gel® Laryngeal Masks in General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02925598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Type of Laryngeal Mask : I-Gel & LMA ProSeal
NCT00624403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ambu®AuraGain™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Normal Airway Patients
NCT03108391 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Crossover Study of the LMA SupremeTM vs Ambu-Aura GainTM
NCT02458794 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain and Intersurgical i-Gel Laryngeal Masks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04206592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryseal Pro LMA Versus Ambu Aura Gain LMA in Elective Ophthalmological Surgeries
NCT06140667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ambu AuraOnce Versus Ambu AuraGain LM in Children
NCT02811042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree Via the I-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme
NCT02476565 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AMBU AScope2 Fiberoptic Intubation Versus Fastrach Intubating LMA
NCT01656967 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
NCT03118596 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low Skill Fibreoptic Intubation I-gel vs Air-Q
NCT02663843 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of Air-Q SP 3G and i-Gel
NCT04951089 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel and the Self-pressurized Air-q in Elderly Patients
NCT04365192 ·Status: COMPLETED