The Effect Of I-Gel And Ambu Aura-I Use On Laryngofaryngeal Mucosa

NCT04062747 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2019-08-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Supraglottic airway devices (SGADs) are frequently preferred in surgical surgery for pediatric patients. i-gel LMA (laryngeal mask airway) and Ambu Aura-i LMA are the new generation supraglottic airway devices. The aim of this study was to compare airway trauma and postoperative complications due to i-gel and Ambu Aura in infants. In the study patients were divided into two groups performed on minor surgery ASA I (American Society of Anesthesiologists score) and 40 infants. After standard anesthesia i-Gel was placed into a group and Ambu Aura-i was placed to the other. Flexible bronchoscopy was performed at the end of surgery. Mucosal damage and postoperative complications in laryngopharyngeal structures were compared.

Conditions

  • Mucosal Damage

Interventions

DEVICE

I-gel

After standard anesthesia i-Gel was placed into the patient

DEVICE

Ambu aura i

After standard anesthesia ambu aura was placed into the patient

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Bezmialem Vakif University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
2 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-18
Primary Completion
2019-09-15
Completion
2019-09-20

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04062747 on ClinicalTrials.gov