MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

NCT03347136 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2017-11-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness of treatment with Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in decreasing the requirement for endotracheal ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress within the first hours of birth.Primary outcome is the non invasive respiratory support failure and the need for intubated ventilatory support during the first 72 hours of life.

Randomized control , single center trial. Eighty neonates admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) were randomly allocated to NIPPV and CPAP. Outcomes of respiratory support were observed and information on risk factors were obtained by going through bed head ticket.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Distress of Newborn

Interventions

DEVICE

CPAP

DEVICE

NIPPV

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • ANNE KS GOMEZ, MBBS,MD · Teaching Hospital Mahamodara

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Minutes
Max Age
24 Hours
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-10
Primary Completion
2015-12-15
Completion
2015-12-28

Countries

  • Sri Lanka

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03347136 on ClinicalTrials.gov