MedTrace Logo

Short Term Effects of Synchronized vs. Non-synchronized NIPPV in Preterm Infants.

NCT03289936 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2023-11-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparing the cardio-respiratory adaptation and differences to non invasive ventilation techniques, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) non synchronized vs synchronized (SNIPPV) in preterm newborns (gestational age at birth \< 32 weeks) at their first approach to non invasive ventilation as first intention (soon after birth) or after extubation.

Conditions

  • Newborn Respiratory Distress
  • Preterm Infant

Interventions

DEVICE

NIPPV

Non invasive ventilation technique in which PIP and PEEP administration is not synchronized with newborn's respiratory efforts

DEVICE

SNIPPV

Non invasive ventilation technique in which PIP and PEEP administration is synchronized with newborn's respiratory efforts through an algorithm based on flow detection

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Turin, Italy

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Francesco Cresi, PhD · Città della Salute e della Scienza - Ospedale S.Anna - University of Turin

  • Alessandra Coscia, Prof. · Città della Salute e della Scienza - Ospedale S.Anna - University of Turin

  • Elena Maggiora, MD · Città della Salute e della Scienza - Ospedale S.Anna - University of Turin

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Max Age
32 Weeks
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-11-16
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2024-12-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03289936 on ClinicalTrials.gov