MedTrace Logo

NIPPV Versus Bi-level Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Following Extubation

NCT02842190 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 140

Last updated 2019-10-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Mechanical ventilation is important in the care of preterm infants with respiratory failure, but may be associated with lung injury. Efforts are needed to avoid or minimize the use of mechanical ventilation. However, there is no consensus on the best non-invasive ventilation mode after extubation in preterm infants.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus bi-level nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BIPAP) following extubation in preterm infants ≤ 1250 g birthweight.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

NIPPV

after ekstubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Serife Suna Oguz · Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Recruiting

  • Nurdan Uras · Zekai Tahir Burak Maternity Teaching Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Recruiting

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Day
Max Age
14 Days
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-15
Primary Completion
2017-06-30
Completion
2019-10-15

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02842190 on ClinicalTrials.gov