Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

NCT02966483 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1114

Last updated 2025-01-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been successfully proven to be a non-inferior alternative regarding resection quality, and oncological outcomes of patients as compared to open surgery in mangy clinical trails. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is advantageous over open surgery with regard to operative invasiveness, patient's recovery, and wound related complications. Thus, laparoscopic surgery has gained great popularity over the past decades. However, specifically for mid and low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery is technically demanding, which sometimes leads to high morbidity and unsatisfactory resection quality, especially in challenging cases such as bulky mesorectum, enlarged prostate, irradiated pelvis, etc. Under this circumstance, transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) , the so called "down-to-up" alternative, has emerged as a promising solution to these problems in recent years and more and more small studies have proven the feasibility and advantages of this technique, making it become a hot topic among both literature and conferences. However, TaTME is still at early birth, higher-level evidences, either multicentric, or comparative study with conventional surgery is strikingly lacking. Thus the investigators conduct this multicentre randomised clinical trial, comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer, aiming to prove the hypothesis that TaTME may achieve better resection quality and result in non-inferior oncological outcome, as well as short term operative morbidity and mortality.

Conditions

  • Rectal Neoplasms Malignant
  • Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

TaTME

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision

PROCEDURE

LpTME

Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • The First Hospital of Jilin University

    collaborator OTHER
  • RenJi Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Shengjing Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Second People's Hospital of Yibin

    collaborator OTHER
  • Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Nanchong Central Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Zunyi Medical College

    collaborator OTHER
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China

    collaborator OTHER
  • Xinqiao Hospital

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Ruijin Hospital

    collaborator OTHER
  • Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University

    collaborator OTHER
  • The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

    collaborator OTHER
  • Sun Yat-sen University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jianping Wang, MD,PHD · The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-04-30
Primary Completion
2026-07-31
Completion
2026-07-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02966483 on ClinicalTrials.gov