MedTrace Logo

Conventional Laparoscopic APR Versus Laparoscopic APR With Transabdominal Individualized Levator Transection

NCT02812628 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 528

Last updated 2016-06-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is designed to compare the short-term and long-term benefits between conventional laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) and laparoscopic APR with transabdominal individualized levator transection (TILT).

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

LAPR

Patients undergoing conventional LAPR, the common surgical procedure to treat low rectal cancer ≤5m from anal verge.

PROCEDURE

LAPR-TILT

Patients undergoing LAPR-TILT, a modified APR procedure that is supposed to be safer and less invasive as compared to the LAPR.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ruijin Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bo Feng, Ph.D · Ruijin Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-12-31
Primary Completion
2020-06-30
Completion
2022-06-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02812628 on ClinicalTrials.gov