Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04481659 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2020-07-22
Summary
The conventional intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer requires a combined abdominal and perineal approach, and followed with a handsewn coloanal anastomosis, which is time consuming and difficult to accomplish. A complete laparoscopic abdominal approach partial intersphincteric resection has been proved to be a safe and feasible alternative for low rectal cancer treatment, with the advantages of technical convenience and avoiding a permanent ostomy. But there are few reports concerning differences in clinical outcomes between patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy undergoing partial ISR surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the functional outcomes (including anal and sexual function, and postoperative quality of life \[QOL\]) and oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent completely abdominal approach laparoscopic partial ISR surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with those who received ISR surgery directly. Furthermore, the operation difficulty between the above two groups is also worthy of intensive study.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Lap partial ISR
A direct laparoscopic surgery with completely abdominal approach laparoscopic partial intersphincteric resection
- COMBINATION_PRODUCT
-
NCRT+Lap partial ISR
Preoperative radiation and chemotherapy + laparoscopic completely abdominal approach laparoscopic partial intersphincteric resection
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Zhongnan Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-07-19
- Primary Completion
- 2025-07-19
- Completion
- 2025-07-19
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Fast Track Laparoscopic Surgery: A Better Option for Treating Colorectal Cancer Than Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT01969591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conformal Sphincter-Preservation Operation Versus InterSphincteric Resection on Anal Function in Low Rectal Cancer
NCT06567756 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT00470951 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Short-term Outcomes of Day Surgery for Patients With CuRC
NCT04646915 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Endolaparoscopic Versus Immediate Surgery for Obstructing Colorectal Cancers
NCT00164879 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03470142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bacteriological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201872 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Carcinoma
NCT00485316 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Trial of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic-assisted Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT02673177 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic IIeocecus-Sparing Right Hemicolectomy for Cancer of the Hepatic Flexure and Proximal Transverse Colon
NCT04479111 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum
NCT04936581 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Role of Pelvic Peritonization in Laparoscopic or Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03699761 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Cross" Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection
NCT03731754 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reinforced Versus Conventional Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Comparative Study
NCT07346534 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Open Technique in Management of Rectal Carcimoma
NCT05685680 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT00007930 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT04527861 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Phase II Study on Continuous Circumferential Reinforcement of Laparoscopic Rectal Anastomosis to Prevent Complications
NCT06495853 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection in Elderly Patients
NCT04673526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Transanal Endoscopy Rectosigmoid Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01340755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Low and High Ligation With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in the Laparoscopy Rectal Cancer
NCT03498885 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA