Study on Effect of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Technology on Genitourinary Function After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT06409403 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 164
Last updated 2024-05-10
Summary
Intraoperative pelvic autonomic nerve (PAN) injury is the dominant reason for genitourinary malfunction after total mesorectal excision (TME), particularly in low rectal tumours. TME necessitates meticulous, sharp dissection with an awareness of the PAN pathway. In particular, laparoscopic TME (L-TME) is technically difficult and requires advanced laparoscopic surgical skills. Comparing with the conventional laparoscopic approach, 3D vision, surgeon-manipulated camera systems, and multi-degree-of-freedom robotic instruments facilitate identification and preservation of the PAN during robotic-assisted TME (R-TME), theoretically facilitating favourable recovery of postoperative genitourinary function. Previous studies have mostly focused on the impact of advanced robotic technologies on postoperative functions. However, in addition to robotic surgical technology, postoperative function is impacted by multiple other intricate factors, such as oncology, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Consequently, the superiority of robotic surgery in terms of recovery of postoperative genitourinary function has been controversial in previous studies. Hence, to comprehensively evaluate the effect of robotic technology on postoperative genitourinary function, we conducted a prospective controlled study comparing the conventional approach and robotic surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
clinical application of robotic technique
effect of various surgical technique on clinical efficacy of TME
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
general surgery 3
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Effectiveness of Robotic Surgery for Right Colon Cancer
NCT06421974 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic vs. TaTME Rectal Surgery (ROTA STUDY)
NCT04200027 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Left Hemicolectomy for Left Colon Cancer
NCT03696472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Versus Partial Preservation of Denonvilliers' Fascia on Urogenital Function in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT04672603 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Colon and Rectal Surgery Prognostic and Outcome Analysis
NCT05210647 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Application of Left Colic Artery Preservation, Anastomotic Reinforcing Sutures and Transanal Tube in Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03609710 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Application Value of da Vinci Linear Cutting Stapler SureForm in Robotic Anus Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT05667181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right Colon Cancer: a 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study
NCT06454253 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Urinary Retention Following taTME VS laTME Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT06147492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Top-down Intersphincteric Resection
NCT05961969 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Multicenter Study on Suprapubic Catheterization Versus Transurethral Catheterization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT02728427 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reinforced Versus Conventional Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Comparative Study
NCT07346534 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Benefits of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer in Patients: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
NCT06396845 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
NCT06397053 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multicenter Study on Postoperative Urinary and Sexual Function During Laparoscopic Functional Total Mesorectum Excision
NCT05049317 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Population-based Analysis of Prevalence, Trends and Outcomes
NCT06959849 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Prospective Registration Study of Robtic Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04843189 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Effects of Abdominal Nerve Block on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery
NCT04147481 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Endolaparoscopic Versus Immediate Surgery for Obstructing Colorectal Cancers
NCT00164879 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Bacteriological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201872 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04481659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA