Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities
NCT02948686 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 38
Last updated 2023-12-14
Summary
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Ambar Universal (FGM, Joinville, Brazil). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 38 enrolled patients will receive four Class V dental restorations, made in four different ways, one from each experimental group, using the same universal self-etching adhesive system, which is the tested material in this study. Non-carious cervical lesions will receive the applied adhesive system in 4 different protocols separated by groups. Group Self Etching (SET) (control): no conditioning, the adhesive system will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with Light Emission Diode (LED) light; Group SEE (Selective enamel etching): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group SETT (Self-Etching with extended time): Similar to Group SET, but during the 2 applications, the adhesive systems will be brushed during 20 seconds, and not during 10 seconds as described in Group SET; Group SETL (Self-Etching with extended number of layers): The adhesive system will be applied as describe in Group SET, but the researchers will apply 4 layers, and not 2 layers, as described in Group SET. After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin, and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Conditions
- Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Self-Etching Application Strategy
In Group SET, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores.
- OTHER
-
Enamel Etching Application Strategy
In Group SEE, 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores.
- OTHER
-
Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy
In Group SETT, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 20 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 20 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores
- OTHER
-
Self Etching with Extended layers number Strategy
In Group SETL, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidade Federal Fluminense
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, DDS, PHD · Universidade Federal Fluminense
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-04-01
- Completion
- 2023-08-30
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Temporary Filling Material Composition on the Success Rate of Endodontic Treatments
NCT03488316 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Regenerative Endodontics for Non-vital Primary Molars
NCT05098483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive
NCT05928533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Solvent Evaporation Time of Universal Adhesives in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
NCT05945173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites
NCT03924830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Endodontic Treatment Techniques in Postoperative Symptoms, Apical Repair, Longevity of Rehabilitations, and Oral Health-related Quality of Life
NCT03704857 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy Using Neoputty Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Versus Pulpectomy Using Endoflas In Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06922578 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Lining Strategies on Amalgam Restorations
NCT02435459 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Resin Cement Composition on the Longevity of Intraradicular Post of Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT03491527 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bioceramic Putty MTA Versus MTA in Pulpotomy of Immature Permanent Molars
NCT06219824 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Success and Color Stability of MTA Pulpotomized Primary Molars: an RCT
NCT02702505 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Color Dental Alteration Caused by Endodontic Treatment
NCT03841877 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Calcium Silicate-doped Treated Dentin Matrix and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as Miniature Pulpotomy Biomaterials in Deep Carious Lesions
NCT07302438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Repair of Proximal Restoration Resin Bulk Fill. Clinical Trial
NCT05013866 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine as Pulp Medicaments in Primary Molars
NCT05102318 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT03771196 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of a Chemically Activated Composite Resin Alkasite in Atypical Caries Lesions of Deciduous Teeth
NCT04195386 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials for Retrograde Filling in Apical Surgery.
NCT07246512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation the Post Operative Pain of Endodontic Treated Molar Tooth With Race and Reciprocal Systems Among Bandarabbas Patients in 2017
NCT03488836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3