A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
NCT02888093 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44
Last updated 2019-12-02
Summary
Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is a commonly performed, vaginal surgery for the correction of female pelvic organ prolapse. The original description of this procedure included the use of permanent sutures. However, permanent suture use in this vaginal application can result in some minor complication such as persistent vaginal spotting, vaginal discharge and dyspareunia. Subsequent reports on this procedure have utilized delayed-absorbable sutures in order to avoid these complications. Retrospective studies are conflicting as to whether or not absorbable suture provides as durable an anatomic outcome as permanent suture. There are currently no high-quality, prospective studies that have evaluated outcomes of permanent and absorbable suture for uterosacral ligament suspension.
This study will recruit women scheduled to undergo USLS with or without other prolapse or anti-incontinence procedures. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to permanent or absorbable suture. Follow up will occur at 6 weeks and 12 months post-operatively. The primary outcome will be Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Exam (POP-Q) point C as measured at the 12 month follow up visit. Subjects and assessors will be blinded.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Cystocele
- Uterine Prolapse
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Absorbent suture (polydioxanone) and Permanent suture (Gore-Tex CV2)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
International Urogynecological Association
collaborator OTHER -
Joseph Kowalski
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Joseph T Kowalski, MD · University of Iowa
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-11-30
- Completion
- 2018-11-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Different Types of Suture for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT03582410 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ SRS) During Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT01608568 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PDS Versus Prolene as Suture Material for Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT05964881 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT03736811 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes Between Novel Tailored Transvaginal Mesh Surgery and Vaginal Native Tissue Repair Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02465710 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Continuous Stitches Versus Simple Interrupted Stitches for Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT05449054 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy for Severe Rectal Prolapse
NCT05254860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Composite Outcomes of Mesh vs Suture Techniques for Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial
NCT02965313 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Anchor for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03378622 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc)
NCT01551992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Absorbable Sutures in Perineal Laceration Repair
NCT00223119 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Liga Sure Versus Conventional Suture Ligature for Decrease Blood Loss During Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT03505333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Skin Incision Closure
NCT02459093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Trial of Techniques for Umbilical Reconstruction
NCT02723409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Suturing Technique Types on Pubocervical Fascia at Colpographhy Anterior for Cystocele Repair
NCT05444023 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT00933829 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Zip-Stitch™ for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy - Safety & Efficacy Study
NCT04081727 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Intrauterine Stent Placement Following Hysteroscopic Septum Resection
NCT07032506 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT01509950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Vaginal Wall Site-specific Defect Reconstructions
NCT04635514 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut
NCT03303014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AirSeal®Insufflation Trocar/CO2 Absorption Study
NCT02654808 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Veritas Collagen Matrix Cystocele Repair Study - Postmarketing
NCT00860912 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Immune Reactivity of Biofilms in Vaginal Mesh Erosion.
NCT00564044 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radical Cystectomy: Can We Improve Our Surgical Technique With the Ligasure Impact Tissue-Sealing Device?
NCT00802633 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA