AirSeal®Insufflation Trocar/CO2 Absorption Study
NCT02654808 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 132
Last updated 2021-09-16
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption during gynecologic laparoscopy using the AirSeal® valveless trocar system versus standard insufflation trocars at intra-abdominal pressures of 10 and 15 mmHg.
The investigators hypothesize that with the AirSeal® valveless trocar system, gynecologic laparoscopy can be performed at a lower intra-abdominal pressure with a possible resultant decrease in CO2 absorption, while maintaining adequate visualization of the operative field for safe completion of surgery.
Conditions
- Gynecologic Diseases
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
AirSeal trocar
The AirSeal® trocar is a valveless trocar that has been designed to replace the "trap door" and silicone valve of standard trocars with a curtain of forced CO2 gas. With the AirSeal® trocar, escaping gas is collected at the proximal end of the trocar, filtered, and redirected into the peritoneal cavity to maintain the pressure differential. The result is an invisible barrier that instantaneously responds to changes in intra-abdominal pressure, either by allowing more CO2 inflow with pressure drops or by serving as a pressure relief valve during pressure spikes.
- DEVICE
-
Standard trocar
A standard insufflation trocar delivers CO2 into the abdominal cavity to create workspace and uses either a "trap door" or silicone valve to prevent the egress of CO2 during laparoscopy in order to maintain intra-abdominal pressures. The standard trocars are not equipped to respond to changes in the intra-abdominal pressures in order to trigger an increase or decrease in the flow rate of CO2 gas.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
SurgiQuest, Inc.
collaborator INDUSTRY - lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Timothy Ryntz, MD · Columbia University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-04-30
- Completion
- 2017-05-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Modified Mesh on Surgical Success in Transobturator Tape Surgery
NCT06924450 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent Wound Complications Following Cesarean Section in High Risk Patients
NCT03082664 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Permanent Versus Absorbable Colpopexy Trial
NCT02277925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Methods of Securing Skin Grafts Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) and Gauze Suction (GSUC)
NCT00952120 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
PROPEL-2: Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Laparotomy Wounds
NCT05977816 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (VAC) in Gynecologic Oncology (G.O.)
NCT04584957 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SurgiWrapTM to Reduce Soft Tissue Attachment & Incidence Early Post-Operative Bowel Obstruction in Colorectal Surgery
NCT00531739 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc)
NCT01551992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Comparative Study of Open Abdomen That Require the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for Temporary Abdominal Closure
NCT03431220 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Abdomen: Vacuum Pack Versus Sylo Bag and Mesh Protocol
NCT01864590 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Types of Suture for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT03582410 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
XCEL Bladeless Trocar Versus Veress Needle: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing These Two Entry Techniques in Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery.
NCT00731107 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
INSORB Versus Subcuticular Sutures at Cesarean Section
NCT01687972 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Wound Vac Polypropylene Suture Pilot Study
NCT02929238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Conventional Dressings Following Abdominal Surgery
NCT02534116 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
PMCF Study for COSEAL® in Gynecologic Surgery
NCT05996809 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Use of Stratafix Symmetric™ to Prevent Incisional Hernia in Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Surgery
NCT06063577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
NCT02888093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT05112640 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT03736811 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Hypertonic Saline After Damage Control Laparotomy to Improve Early Primary Fascial Closure
NCT02297659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Staples Versus Subcuticular Suture in Class III Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT02466776 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT07167199 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Split Scar Study of Suture Safe Treatment of Surgical Wounds to Minimize Scaring
NCT02620475 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Modified Burch Colposuspension
NCT05616481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA