Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse Repair

NCT00535301 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75

Last updated 2015-04-22

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is determine whether grafted anterior vaginal prolapse repair is more effective and associated with less complications than prolapse repair with suture.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

grafted anterior prolapse repair

anterior vaginal prolapse repair with graft

PROCEDURE

sutured anterior vaginal prolapse repair

anterior vaginal prolapse repair with suture

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Kaiser Permanente

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • John N Nguyen, MD · Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-01-31
Primary Completion
2008-04-30
Completion
2008-04-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00535301 on ClinicalTrials.gov