Absorbable Suture vs Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
NCT05688059 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 49
Last updated 2025-04-13
Summary
Sacrospinous ligament suspension (SSLS) was first described in 1958. It is commonly performed for correction of apical prolapse. A combination of delayed absorbable and/or permanent sutures are commonly used for the procedure. When permanent sutures are used, risk of suture-related complications is present and patients may require suture removal. In available literature, there is limited data comparing the efficacy and suture-related complications when using different types of sutures. A previous randomized controlled trial demonstrated that using an absorbable suture is equally efficacious as delayed absorbable sutures in SSLS. However, there is no comparison to absorbable versus permanent suture. Our aim is to compare the absorbable suture versus permanent suture for treating pelvic organ prolapse and to compare suture-related complications.
Our primary outcome is comparing POPQ point C at 12 month follow up for absorbable vs permanent suture.
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to absorbable or permanent suture. Follow up will occur at 2-4 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months after the surgery.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Uterovaginal Prolapse
- Vaginal Vault Prolapse
- Cystocele
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Absorbable Suture and Permanent Suture
Absorbable Suture and Permanent Suture
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Atlantic Health System
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Laura Dhariwal, MD · Atlantic Health System
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-01-06
- Primary Completion
- 2025-01-09
- Completion
- 2025-01-09
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy for Severe Rectal Prolapse
NCT05254860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ Srs) During Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Randomized Controlled Trial (Quill Lsc)
NCT01551992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Permanent Versus Absorbable Colpopexy Trial
NCT02277925 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LOOP VS DOUBLE SUTURE TECHNIQUES IN SACROSPINOUS FIXATION: A TWO-YEAR STUDY
NCT07106866 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Affixing Polypropylene Mesh Using Barbed Suture (Quill™ SRS) During Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT01608568 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PDS Versus Prolene as Suture Material for Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT05964881 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT03736811 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Small Stitch Study
NCT02469584 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anchor for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03378622 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05760794 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03427606 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes Between Novel Tailored Transvaginal Mesh Surgery and Vaginal Native Tissue Repair Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT02465710 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
REDUCE Trial- Reducing Prolapse Recurrence
NCT04880239 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Hand Sewn End-To-End Anastomosis Versus Side-To-Side Anastomosis for Stoma Reversal: A Prospective Study
NCT05753709 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT00544583 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Intrauterine Stent Placement Following Hysteroscopic Septum Resection
NCT07032506 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT01509950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Absorbable Sutures in Perineal Laceration Repair
NCT00223119 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Operative Time During the Use of the Synthetic Glue IFABONDTM in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03307824 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Composite Outcomes of Mesh vs Suture Techniques for Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Controlled Multicentre Trial
NCT02965313 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Vaginal Wall Site-specific Defect Reconstructions
NCT04635514 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Suturing Technique Types on Pubocervical Fascia at Colpographhy Anterior for Cystocele Repair
NCT05444023 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Repair of Vaginal Wall Prolapse Using Gamma Irradiated Amniotic Membrane as a Scaffold
NCT05355623 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Traditional vs. Graft-augmented Posterior Colporrhaphy
NCT00581594 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Long-term Stability of Sheath Plication Using Absorbable Sutures in Patients With Diastasis of the Recti Muscles: an Ultrasonography Study
NCT01586559 ·Status: COMPLETED