Segmental Epidural Anesthesia (SEA) V/S General Anesthesia for PCNL
NCT02878512 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2016-08-25
Summary
Management of nephrolithiasis has been revolutionized by the advent of shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique and is used for the fragmentation and removal of stones of size more than 20 to 30 mm, staghorn stones or multiple stones resistant to ESWL. Anaesthesia for PCNL is a challenge because of the disease, surgical procedure, positioning, hypothermia,and the possibility of fluid absorption, dilutional anaemia and blood loss. General anaesthesia is the gold standard for this surgery.The advent of new drugs has refined the technique of general anaesthesia. However there are several issues related to prone position still to be addressed like accidental extubation and difficult reintubation, nerve injuries and post operative respiratory complications.
Combined spinal epidural(CSE) and only epidural anaesthesia (EA) is a well established technique of anaesthesia for upper abdomen and lower thoracic surgeries. It use has also been reported in PCNL surgeries.Segmental epidural can selectively blocks pain fibres from the surgical site. This not only allows to limit the dose of the local anaesthetics, but also limit motor and sympathetic blockade. Selective sympathetic block is associated with respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and metabolic benefits. This formed the basis of our current study. In the present study the investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy of segmental epidural for PCNL and compared it with standard technique i.e. GA.
Conditions
- Success Rate Under Segmental Epidural
- Post Operative Pain
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
PCNL under General Anesthesia
Patients undergoing percutaneous Nephrolithotomy received General anesthesia.
- PROCEDURE
-
Segmental Epidural Anesthesia
Patients undergoing PCNL surgery received Segmental epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2010-12-31
- Completion
- 2010-12-31
More Related Trials
-
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoroscopic Guided vs US-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy for the Treatment of Stone Disease
NCT04606758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrolaminar Block Analgesia and Patient Comfort During Prone ESWL
NCT07177625 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Guided PCNL Versus Standard PCNL
NCT04825353 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PCNL Versus Standard-PCNL For The Management of 20-40 mm Size Kidney Stones
NCT02635048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Radiation-Free Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones
NCT06922006 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Through-and-through Guidewire on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06837883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ROBOTIC PYELOLITHIOTOMY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL).
NCT03046888 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy With Tip-bendable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3cm Renal Stones
NCT06526390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Stones in Adults Under Locally Infiltrate d Anaesthetics ; a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06462573 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Ureteral Access Sheath or Percutaneous Nephrostomy During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Which is Better?
NCT05633030 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Total Tubeless Mini-PCNL Versus Tubeless Mini-PCNL
NCT06288022 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prediction of Sepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04340037 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Kidney Stones Greater Than 2 cm
NCT03189264 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultra-mini PCNL and Micro PCNL
NCT02522689 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound First Clinical Decision Support for Suspected Nephrolithiasis
NCT03461536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Ureteral Catheterization Is Not Essential in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06750913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Three Endourological Procedures for the Management of Renal Calculi Regarding Acute Kidney Injury
NCT03112499 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Trifecta Analysis of Standard Versus Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Urolithiasis
NCT06836700 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT00873054 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of General Anaesthesia and Sedation on the Stone Fragmentation in Lithotripsy
NCT01361516 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA