Veress Entry With/Without Concomitant CO2
NCT02896036 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2018-03-30
Summary
Purpose: The primary objective is to compare the time required for adequate intraperitoneal insufflation (from skin incision to reaching intraperitoneal pressure of 15 mmHg). Also the number of attempts needed before successful entry is achieved. The secondary objectives will evaluate rates of secondary outcomes measures such as; failed entry, extra peritoneal insufflation, vascular injury, visceral injury, gas embolism, solid organ injury, and omental injury between the two techniques.
Study design: prospective randomized control trial
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that participant's undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign Gynecologic indications at TGH who undergo laparoscopic entry technique of Veress needle entry with concomitant CO2 insufflation will require less time to achieve a 15 mmHg of intraperitoneal pressure as opposed to Veress needle entry with subsequent CO2 insufflation, and will require less number of attempts to achieve successful entry.
Conditions
- Laparoscopy
- Laparoscopic Surgery
- Insufflation
- Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Veress needle entry with concomitant CO2
The Veress will be connected to the CO2 tubing, and a skin incision will be made with the scalpel, followed by starting the CO2 gas insufflation and insertion of the Veress needle.
- PROCEDURE
-
Veress needle entry with subsequent CO2
A skin incision will be made with the scalpel. The Veress needle will be inserted until intraperitoneal location obtained. This will be followed by starting CO2 gas insufflation until the standard 15 mmHg.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tampa General Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
University of South Florida
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Emad Mikhail, MD · University of South Florida Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Anthony Imudia, MD · University of South Florida Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Elisabeth Sappenfield, MD · University of South Florida Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-03-10
- Completion
- 2018-03-10
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Role of Subcutaneous Negative Pressure Suction Drain Placed for Ten Days on Wound Healing in Obese Patients Undergoing Midline Laparotomies
NCT02832076 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Primary Fascial Closure Rate in Patients With Open Abdomen Treated With Abthera Versus Barker Technique
NCT02952976 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Delayed Primary Closure Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NCT04042259 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Irrigation Versus Suction in Complicated Acute Appendicitis
NCT02688244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Repair of Genitovesical Fistula in Females
NCT07043062 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Types of Temporary Abdominal Closure on Intra Abdominal Hypertension.
NCT02229695 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Burst Abdomen in Emergency Midline Laparotomy: Incidence and Risk
NCT03684902 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Comparative Study of Open Abdomen That Require the Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for Temporary Abdominal Closure
NCT03431220 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study on Cesarean Wound Outcomes
NCT01697748 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Site Infection Rate After Intra-Abdominal Surgery Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy at Initial Closure
NCT01924884 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PROPEL-2: Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Laparotomy Wounds
NCT05977816 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Techniques for Umbilical Reconstruction
NCT02723409 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Needle-Aspirated Compression Dressing Following Ostomy Reversal
NCT03703661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Modified Mesh on Surgical Success in Transobturator Tape Surgery
NCT06924450 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Small Versus Large Bite Closure of Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT04098380 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Single- Versus Double-layer Hysterotomy Closure on Cesarean Niche Development: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06308172 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Need for Subcutaneous Wound Drains in Ileostomy Reversal
NCT01050686 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy
NCT00544583 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Continuous Locked Non-barbed Suture for Mesh Fixation During Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy for Severe Rectal Prolapse
NCT05254860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Vac Polypropylene Suture Pilot Study
NCT02929238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Irrigation and Suction Trial to Prevent SSI
NCT05611944 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of Continuous Versus Interrupted Subcutaneous Fat Closure in Reducing Surgical Site Infection
NCT05856968 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Permanent vs Absorbable Suture for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension
NCT02888093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cerclage: New Approach
NCT02457377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA