MedTrace Logo

NIV-NAVA vs NIV-PS/PC in Respiratory Insufficiency

NCT02592512 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2017-07-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study evaluates the difference between Non Invasive Ventilation with Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NIV-NAVA) and Conventional Non Invasive Ventilation with Pressure Support (PS) or Pressure Control (PC). All the patients are ventilated in each mode for 4 hours. Afterwards they will be subjected to a semi-structured interview where they will be asked to compare the two modes. The hypothesis is that NIV-NAVA will correct patients power of Hydrogen (pH), PaCO2 og PaO2 more quickly than NIV-PS and NIV-NAVA is more comfortable for the patients.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Insufficiency
  • Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

Interventions

OTHER

NIV-NAVA

Cross-over study where participants are randomized to start with either NIV-NAVA or NIV-PS/PC for 4 hours, followed by another 4 hours with the other arm.

OTHER

NIV-PS/PC

Cross-over study where participants are randomized to start with either NIV-NAVA or NIV-PS/PC for 4 hours, followed by another 4 hours with the other arm.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Vejle Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Alan Kimper-Karl, MD · Vejle Hospital

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-10-31
Primary Completion
2017-04-30
Completion
2017-04-30

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02592512 on ClinicalTrials.gov