Impact of PAV Versus NAVA on Patient-Ventilator Synchrony and Respiratory Muscle Unloading

NCT01810510 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2016-11-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether two modes of artificial (i.e. mechanical) ventilation have an impact on patient synchrony with the ventilator (breathing machine) and on the patient's work of breathing.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

PAV Ventilation

PAV is a mode of ventilation in which the only set parameter is the proportion of work/effort that is provided regardless of the ventilatory pattern the patient chooses- the patient has full control over pressure, volume, flow and time of inspiration as well as respiratory rate. In this mode, the ventilator measures patient respiratory mechanics every 10-15 breaths and delivers a level of pressure proportional to patient effort, thereby maintaining a set proportion of patient effort regardless of the patient's ventilatory pattern. The patients will be on this mode of ventilation for 60 minutes.

PROCEDURE

NAVA Ventilation

With NAVA, delivery from the ventilator is triggered, controlled and cycled by the diaphragmatic EMG signal (Edi), which is measured by a specially designed nasogastric or orogastric catheter (NGT or OGT) containing EMG electrodes that cross the diaphragm. In this mode, the ventilator measures the Edi with each breath and instantaneously delivers a level of pressure proportional to Edi magnitude, thereby providing a set proportion of effort on a breath-to-breath basis. The patients will be on this mode of ventilation for 60 minutes.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Robert S Harris, MD · Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-04-30
Primary Completion
2016-09-30
Completion
2016-09-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01810510 on ClinicalTrials.gov