Head Motion in Pediatric Patients Endotracheally Intubated With Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT02405390 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 92
Last updated 2017-06-12
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if intubation with video laryngoscopy (VL) will result in less head motion and therefore less cervical motion when compared with direct laryngoscopy (DL).
The aim of the study is to determine the amount of head motion (extension, flexion and rotation) when using Storz C-Mac® video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopes. Secondarily, the study will also measure the number of attempts to properly intubate and the time required for intubation with either technique.
Conditions
- Intubation; Difficult
- Cervical Spine Injury
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Video Laryngoscopy
Head motion will be measured by using Polhemus Patriot™ electromagnetic tracking system
- PROCEDURE
-
Direct Laryngoscopy
Time for intubation will be measured from the laryngoscope entering the mouth to the endotracheal tube passing through the vocal cords
- DEVICE
-
Storz C-Mac® laryngoscope
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Florida International University
collaborator OTHER -
Nicklaus Children's Hospital f/k/a Miami Children's Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jose Vargas Loayza, MD · Miami Children's Hospital Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow
-
Vincenzo Maniaci, MD · Miami Children's Hospital Pediatric Emergency Medicine Attending
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2015-06-30
- Completion
- 2015-06-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
King Vision and Cervical Spines Movement
NCT01914601 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients
NCT04145089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Stylet vs. Flexible Bronchoscopy for C-Spine
NCT03992092 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pediatric Intubation With Difficult Airway
NCT02291627 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Experience With Storz C-MAC Video Intubation System
NCT01104090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of AirTraq Laryngoscope to Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation of Patients With Potential Cervical Spine Injury
NCT00664612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Neutral Position Facilitates Orotracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopes
NCT04858906 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children With Torticollis
NCT03582787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Full vs. Partial Glottis View Using CMAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope in Simulated Cervical Injury Patient
NCT04833166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Video and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients Who May be Difficult to Intubate
NCT00178555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cervical Spine Motion During Tracheal Intubation: Video Laryngoscope vs Rigid Video Stylet
NCT03120546 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old
NCT01488370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
NCT06644586 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vocal Cord Views With the Classical Miller, Wis-Hipple and C-MAC Size 1 Blades in Young Children
NCT03053583 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT03908775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine
NCT01210092 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laryngoscopy for Neonatal and Infant aIrway Management (Optimise-Trial)
NCT04295902 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Stylet Angles for Orotracheal Intubation Using C-MAC® Video Laryngoscopes in Infants
NCT04745936 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy Vs. Video Laryngoscopy With The C-MAC For Pyloromyotomy
NCT02775214 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Tongue Pull Versus Jaw Thrust
NCT00833118 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT04153357 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Stylet Angles for Orotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope® Video Laryngoscope in Children
NCT02952690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Head and Neck Position During Videolaryngoscopy
NCT02558036 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Video Laryngoscopy for Neonatal Intubation
NCT03035175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4