Locking Compression Plate Fixation Versus Revision- Prosthesis of Vancouver-B2, B3 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Replacement

NCT02391129 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 102

Last updated 2015-03-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical (range of motion, weight bearing, quality of life) and radiographic outcome (boney consolidation) between open reduction and internal fixation using locking compression plates with revision prosthesis using a non-cemented long femoral stem in a group of patients with a Vancouver type-B2, B3 and C periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip replacement.

Conditions

  • Periprosthetic Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Operation for Periprosthetic fractures of the hip with stem loosening

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Vienna

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2015-01-31
Completion
2015-01-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02391129 on ClinicalTrials.gov