MedTrace Logo

Prosthesis Versus Osteosynthesis in Proximal Tibia Fractures

NCT03172715 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 98

Last updated 2024-08-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare knee function and pain one year after treatment of intra-articular proximal tibia fracture using either osteosynthesis with a locking plate (ORIF) or primary total knee replacement (TKR) in patients over 65 years of age.

Conditions

  • Tibial Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Locking plate

Osteosynthesis

PROCEDURE

TKR

Total knee arthroplasty

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tampere University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement

    collaborator OTHER

  • Oulu University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Turku University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV

  • Kuopio University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Seinajoki Central Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Paijat-Hame Hospital District

    collaborator OTHER

  • Central Finland Hospital District

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Juha Paloneva, MD, PhD · Central Finland Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-09
Primary Completion
2026-06-30
Completion
2029-06-30

Countries

  • Finland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03172715 on ClinicalTrials.gov