Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Replacement for Intracapsular Hip Fractures
NCT02998359 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300
Last updated 2021-03-11
Summary
In England each year over 9,000 people fracture their hip. Most of these are elderly females with the fracture occurring after a fall. Approximately half of these fractures are classified as intracapsular fractures because of their close proximity to the hip joint. The majority of these fractures are treated surgically by excising the broken femoral neck and removing the femoral head (ball part of the hip joint) and replacing it with an artificial hip joint. This hip replacement has traditionally been a hemiarthroplasty or sometimes termed a 'half hip replacement' in which only the ball part of the hip joint is replaced.
An alternative type of hip replacement is the full total hip replacement in which the socket part of the joint is also replaced. This is the operation that is used for replacing arthritic hips. In recent years there have been a number of randomised trials that have compared the outcome for patients with an intracapsular hip fracture treated with either a partial hip replacement (hemiarthroplasty) against those treated with a total hip replacement (THR). Results to date have suggested slightly better long term functional results for those treated with a THR, but it still remains unclear if these benefits are offset by the increased surgical complexity of the procedure and the extra cost involved for a THR.
At present the numbers of studies on this topic are too few with limited patient numbers to make any definite conclusions. This study aims to add to the research studies by comparing the two surgical procedures, to enable orthopaedic surgeons to determine the optimum surgical treatment for this common and disabling condition.
Conditions
- Hip Fractures
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Hemiarthroplasty
A cemented polished double taper stem hemiarthroplasty inserted via an anterior-lateral surgical approach (Zimmer incorporated, UK).
- DEVICE
-
Total hip arthroplasty
A cemented polished double taper stem arthroplasty stem inserted via an anterior-lateral surgical approach with a cemented acetabular cup (Zimmer incorporated, UK).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2018-06-30
- Completion
- 2019-07-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Short Versus Standard Intramedullary Nail for Trochanteric Hip Fractures
NCT02680028 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcome After ORIF or Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT06152198 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Geriatric Acetabular fracTures: Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Replacement
NCT03713853 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of a Cemented, Polished Tapered Stem and an Anatomic Stem for Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT02591342 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Nail Versus Sliding Hip Screw for Trochanteric Hip Fractures
NCT03172923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hips Screws or (Total) Hip Replacement for Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients (HipSTHeR)
NCT03966716 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Cephalo-medullary Fixation to Treat Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
NCT05134805 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Determining Best Treatment for Geriatric Acetabular Fractures
NCT03419182 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uncemented Versus Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures
NCT04372966 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Trochanteric Hip Fractures (AO A2) SHS With or Without Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate - Rct Using RSA
NCT02294747 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bipolar Versus Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Patients With a Hip Fracture
NCT00317837 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hip Fractures Treated With Uncemented Arthroplasties
NCT01798472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Intramedullary Nail Versus Hip Arthroplasty in Unstable Trochanteric Hip Fractures
NCT04868305 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Internal Fixation or Joint Replacement Therapy for Aged Hip Fracture Patients
NCT03407131 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Evaluation of Total Hip Replacement After Acetabular Fractures
NCT02892240 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Augmentation in Fragility Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture Treatment
NCT02631824 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Osseointegration of Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Stems in Femoral Neck Fractures Over 80 Years
NCT04773145 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Complications and Functional Outcome of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Younger Than 70 Years
NCT02085707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Status, Morbidity and Mortality in Cemented Versus Press-Fit Hemiarthroplasty
NCT01114646 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Heads for the Treatment of Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly
NCT01109862 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Hemiarthroplasty or Internal Fixation for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures - 5 Years Follow up
NCT00764153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bipolar H.A Versus Trochanteric Antegrade Nail for Treatment of Displaced Subcapital Femoral Fractures
NCT01181037 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Minimally Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture Pilot Study
NCT05947058 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Comparison of 2 Fixation Techniques for Unstable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
NCT00597779 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Hemiarthroplasty or Internal Fixation for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
NCT00464230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4