Helical Blade vs Lag Screw Fixation for Cephalomedullary Nailing of Low Energy Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures

NCT04306198 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2020-03-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study will be to compare the failure and complications rates of and orthopedic implant (Cephalomedullary Nail) fixed with two different options actually available: lag screw or helical blade.

The study population will be patient who have been diagnosed with an intertrochanteric hip fracture.

Hypothesis: Our hypothesis is that the helical blade will have a higher failure rate compared to the lag screw

Conditions

  • Hip Fractures

Interventions

DEVICE

Osteosynthesis with Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN), using a lag screw as a proximal fixation.

Closed reduction and surgical stabilization of intertrochanteric hip fractures using Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN), with lag screw as proximal fixation

DEVICE

Osteosynthesis with Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN), using a helical blade as a proximal fixation.

Closed reduction and surgical stabilization of intertrochanteric hip fractures using Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN), with helical blade as proximal fixation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Instituto Traumatologico Dr. Teodoro Gebauer Weisser

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-03-31
Primary Completion
2021-04-30
Completion
2021-11-30
FDA Device
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04306198 on ClinicalTrials.gov