MedTrace Logo

Study on Cemented Versus Non-cemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly With Hip Fractures

NCT00800124 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 334

Last updated 2014-11-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective is to study the overall frequency and cumulative rate (during one year) of clinical morbidity (defined as any hospitalization without fatal outcome) and mortality in all consecutive patients undergoing HF surgery (pins and prosthetic implants) and compare this to the group of patients receiving prosthetic implants and further find out if there is a difference between the non-cemented and cemented groups.

Between the same prosthetic groups, the investigators want to study the overall frequency of in-hospital subclinical organ damage and dysfunction of myocardium, liver and lungs, using biochemical plasma markers. Finally, the investigators want to perform perioperative cost benefit calculations and out of hospital quality of life analysis between the surgical groups.

Conditions

  • Hip Fracture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

cemented Landos prosthesis vs. uncemented Landos prosthesis

randomization between the cemented and non-cemented prosthesis.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rikshospitalet University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Sykehuset Buskerud HF

    collaborator OTHER

  • Sykehuset Innlandet HF

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ove Talsnes, MD · Sykehsuet Innlandet, Elverum

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-06-30
Primary Completion
2011-06-30
Completion
2011-06-30

Countries

  • Norway

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00800124 on ClinicalTrials.gov