Comparison of Biodegradable and Titanium Fixation Systems in Mandibular Symphysis or Parasymphysis Solitary Fractures
NCT02181868 · Status: APPROVED_FOR_MARKETING · Type: EXPANDED_ACCESS
Last updated 2014-07-04
Summary
The mandible bears a wide range of mechanical load from the contraction of masticatory muscles, and has a significant function in normal chewing movements. Mandibular fractures are the most common maxillofacial fractures, accounting for 40%-71% of all maxillofacial fracture cases with an average of 62%. The etiology of mandibular fractures mainly includes assaults, road traffic accidents (RTAs), falls, and sports injuries. Although a wide variance exists in the reported percentage of anterior mandible fractures, aggregate analysis approximates these fractures at 17% of all mandibular fractures. The rigid internal fixation (RIF) technique has become a common treatment for mandibular fractures, in which titanium plates are used in the operation. Some patients have to remove the titanium plates in a second operation following bone healing because of sequelae, such as stress shielding. Biodegradable plates and screws have been developed to eliminate the problems associated with titanium fixtures. In this study, we aim to compare the clinical performance between biodegradable and titanium fixation systems after 12 months of follow-up in fixation of mandibular symphysis and parasymphysis solitary fractures. We also investigate the stress distributions of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems at mandibular symphysis solitary fracture on the conditions of intercuspal position, labial teeth occlusion, and premolar and molar occlusion using finite element analysis.
Conditions
- Mandible Fracture
- Rigid Internal Fixation
- Three-dimensional Finite Element
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Biodegradable and titanium fixation used in mandibular fractures.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Louqiang Zhang
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2008-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2013-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of Implant Placement for Patients With Mandibular Reconstruction Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guides
NCT06250907 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Post-operative Efficacy of Arch Bar With Single Plate and Two Plate Fixation in Mandibular Parasymphsis Fracture.
NCT06895174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Loss Around Mandibular Implant-retaining Overdentures and Implant Supported Fixed Hybrid Prosthesis
NCT06488599 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Patient Specific Plates Versus Conventional Miniplates for Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT03608891 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Loading Forces Distribution in Mandibular Distal-extension Prostheses
NCT02178384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Patient Specific Zirconium Dioxide Implant Versus Patient Specific Titanium Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation
NCT05377593 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Safety and Performance of Materialise's Patient-specific TMJ System.
NCT06951178 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Mandibular Overdenture Clinical Trial Comparing Parallel Sided and Tapered Dental Implants
NCT03272828 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Flexible Resin in Maxillary Obturators
NCT02482064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Appearance and Function of Three Different Dental Implant Designs When Placed in Front Region of Upper Jaw
NCT00820235 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Locator Attachments Versus Four-Implant Bar Attachments
NCT07093853 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of Locator Versus TITACH Attachment for Mandibular Overdentures.
NCT06228859 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Placement and Stabilization of Dental Implants With Tetranite Stabilization Material in Mandibular and Maxillary Tooth Extraction Sites That Fail to Provide Adequate Primary Stability
NCT04121364 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Primary Implant Stability Between Two Different Magnetic Attachment
NCT04438616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate the Complete Mandibular Dentures Produced Via 3D Printing in Comparison to Those Constructed From Metal-reinforced Acrylic Resin Regarding Their Retention
NCT07061860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Within-subject Comparison of Mandibular Overdentures Retained by 1,2,or 3 Implants
NCT01566227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Dental Occlusion Ties
NCT04985461 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency Between Complete Denture With Zero-degree Teeth and Anatomic Teeth in Patients With Severely Resorbed Ridge
NCT02359955 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Patient-specific Root-analogue Implants and Conventional Root-form Implants for Treating Non-restorable Single-rooted Maxillary Teeth
NCT03689933 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Implant Overdenture With Bar vs OT Equator: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07121881 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microbiological Study on Maxillary Complete Dentures of Two Different Materials
NCT02950623 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Related Factors Influencing the Stability of Dental Implants
NCT02733861 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Immediate Implant in Posterior Mandible Region
NCT07027904 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA