Comparison of the Post-operative Efficacy of Arch Bar With Single Plate and Two Plate Fixation in Mandibular Parasymphsis Fracture.
NCT06895174 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2025-10-08
Summary
This clinical trial is designed to compare post-operative infection, symptoms of paresthesia, inferior border misalignment and operating time of one plate with arch bar against standard two miniplates in mandibular parasymphysis fracture in order to achieve the treatment which is beneficial for the patients. This study will contribute to literature for the betterment of patient.
The objective of this study is to compare the post-operative efficacy of arch bar with single plate and two plate fixation in mandibular parasymphsis fracture.
Conditions
- Mandible Fracture
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Titanium miniplates
Titanium miniplates are used for open reduction and internal fixation in mandible fractures according to Champy's principle of osteosynthesis
- OTHER
-
Arch Bar
Arch bars are used for intermaxillary fixation in facial fractures as a mean of closed reduction.In this study arch bars placed in tension zone will be combined with single miniplate placed at inferior border of mandible and this modality efficacy will be compared with two miniplate group.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
HITEC-Institute of Medical Sciences
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 17 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-30
- Completion
- 2025-06-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05877092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of Patient-Specific Plate for Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture
NCT07231042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Versus Four Implant-supported Fixed Full-arch Prosthesis
NCT05290766 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Osseointegration Properties of Nano-Hydroxy Apatite Coated Titanium Implant
NCT05936775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Maintenance of Two Implant-Retained Overdentures Reinforced With PEKK Versus Co-Cr Frameworks
NCT06219811 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SFI Bars and Milled Bars Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. Three-year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06620497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Edentulous Maxilla Opposed by 2-implant Mandibular Overdenture?
NCT06050213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Two Designs of Patient Specific Osteosynthesis For Fixation of LeFort 1 Osteotomy in Orthognathic Surgery
NCT05522348 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of En-Masse Retraction With Two-Step Retraction Using Mini-Implant As Anchorage
NCT05963438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Complications in Fixed All-On-Four Prosthesis Reinforced with Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Versus Cobalt Chromium (Co-Cr) Framework
NCT06631573 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using Two Different Attachments in Mandibular Implant Overdenture Cases in Order to Retention and Patient Satisfaction
NCT06678945 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Vertical Inter-implant Papilla Height in Platform Matched Implants in Comparison to Morse Connection Abutments
NCT03787355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Stability of Posterior Maxillary Implants With Bicortical Fixation
NCT01237184 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis
NCT06700733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework Removable Partial Dentures Regarding Biting Force
NCT03777423 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Versus Metallic Attachment-retained Obturators
NCT04778254 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading of Four Single Piece Compressive Implants for Bar Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06514391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PEEK Bar Versus Titanium Bar Fabricated by CAD-CAM in Mandibular Hybrid Prostheses: A Comparative Study
NCT06201169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Quadrilateral Versus Bilateral Linear Bar Designs for Four Implant Implant-Assisted Complete Mandibular Overdenture Regarding Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss
NCT06673173 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Tissues of Different Implant Assisted Overdentures
NCT06647199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Implant Overdenture With OT Cap Bar vs Bar Attachment
NCT07067190 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Overdentures vs All-on-4 With PEEK
NCT07137533 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Within-subject Comparison of Mandibular Overdentures Retained by 1,2,or 3 Implants
NCT01566227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA