Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Four Locator Attachments Versus Four-Implant Bar Attachments
NCT07093853 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2025-07-30
Summary
This 10-year retrospective study investigates residual ridge changes in edentulous patients treated with mandibular overdentures (ODs) retained by either four Locator attachments or a four-implant bar system. Although two-implant ODs are well established, four-implant configurations may offer enhanced stability and function. Locator and bar attachments are commonly used, but their long-term effects on bone resorption patterns-especially posterior mandibular and anterior maxillary resorption-remain unclear. By standardizing implant positions, this study aims to directly compare the two systems to help guide clinicians in selecting the most effective attachment type for long-term success.
Conditions
- Bone Loss
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Four Locator Attachments, Four Bar Attachment System
This study retrospectively evaluated two types of implant-retained mandibular overdenture attachment systems placed in edentulous patients over a 10-year period. All patients received four dental implants placed in the interforaminal region (lateral incisor and first premolar areas). In the Locator group, each implant was restored with an individual Locator attachment, allowing for independent retention and easier hygiene access. In the Bar group, the four implants were splinted together with a rigid metal bar, and the overdenture was attached using clips that engaged the bar, offering splinted support and enhanced load distribution. Both interventions were designed to support mandibular overdentures and were compared in terms of their long-term effects on posterior mandibular ridge resorption, marginal bone loss around implants, and anterior maxillary ridge resorption.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mansoura University
collaborator OTHER -
Menoufia University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohammed El-Sawy, PhD · Menoufia University
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-08-01
- Completion
- 2025-10-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using Two Different Attachments in Mandibular Implant Overdenture Cases in Order to Retention and Patient Satisfaction
NCT06678945 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Different Attachment Systems in Mandibular Single Implant Overdenture
NCT07120256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Milled in Versus Round Bar for Mini-implant Retained Mandibular Overdentures
NCT06185283 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Direct Versus Indirect Pick up of the Locator Retentive Caps:(Within-patient Study)
NCT05289752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ball Vs Locator Attachment in Overdenture Retained by Single Mandibular Implant
NCT02952274 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading of Four Single Piece Compressive Implants for Bar Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06514391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Block-out Spacer to Pick up Locator Attachments to Retain Overdenture: Peri-implant and Alveolar Bone Changes
NCT05843825 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Mini Implants Supported Over Dentures Versus Conventional Implant After Bone Expansion
NCT03326453 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction in Single Implant Mandibular Complete Overdentures Retained by CM LOC Versus Ball Attachment
NCT02923661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Height Changes In Three Implants Retained Mandibular Overdenture
NCT04928274 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Edentulous Maxilla Opposed by 2-implant Mandibular Overdenture?
NCT06050213 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Four Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06206005 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Maxillary Implant Overdentures Retained by Bars or Locator
NCT06152432 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Versus Delayed Loading for Implants Retaining Mandibular Complete Overdenture
NCT05620797 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
All on Six Versus Parallel Implant Distribution for Maxillary Denture Opposing Mandibular All on Four
NCT05960500 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Locator Versus TITACH Attachment for Mandibular Overdentures.
NCT06228859 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
All on Four Versus All on Three Implant Treatment Concepts
NCT05912127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss of Two Immediately Loaded Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture
NCT06150755 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Versus Inclined Implant to Retain Locator Maxillary Overdenture
NCT05843331 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT05972538 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Implant Overdenture With Bar vs OT Equator: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07121881 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Retained Overdenture VERSUS Implant Canine Retained Overdenture.
NCT07046104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQL) For Two Pick-up Techniques
NCT06109792 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES RETAINED WITH TWO INCLINED IMPLANTS
NCT05695612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA