A Multicenter RCT to Investigate the Treatment of Double (Bilateral) Mandibular Fractures

NCT02341443 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 314

Last updated 2020-08-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Mandibular fractures represent approximately 50% of the total facial fractures and are commonly (more than half) presented in more than one location. A few simple fractures can be treated using a conservative approach. More often, however, mandibular fractures require stabilization using open reduction and internal fixation.

Simple mandibular fractures can be treated using non-rigid fixation techniques that rely on the load-sharing principle, by which stabilization is accomplished with both fixation devices and bone surfaces. On the other hand, more complex fractures with continuity defects or comminuted need to be handle using rigid fixation where the device assumes all the forces (load-bearing principle). These approaches are well established, whereas the level of evidence for the treatment of bilateral double mandibular fractures (DMF) is still scarce. In fact, which surgical treatment, or combination of treatments, leads to the best outcome and the lowest rate of complications in bilateral DMFs is an open question.

The purpose of this study is to assess the complication rate in patients suffering from bilateral DMF treated either using non-rigid fixation on both fracture sides or a combination of rigid fixation on one side and non-rigid fixation on the other side.

Conditions

  • Mandibular Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Implants

Experimental arm: Rigid Surgical treatment using arch bars and according to the following fixation: Rigid fixation on one side (most anterior fracture) and non-rigid fixation on the other (most posterior fracture). Active comparator: Non-rigid Surgical treatment using arch bars and according to the following fixation: Non-rigid fixation on both fracture sides. Whereas non-rigid fixation is defined as a single miniplate of ≤1.00 mm thickness, and rigid fixation is defined as a single plate of ≥1.25 mm thickness, a combination of 2 plates or a 3D geometric plate.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • AOCMF

    collaborator OTHER
  • AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Risto Kontio, MD DDS PhD · Helsinki University Central Hospital

  • Edward Ellis III, DDS MS · UT Health Science Center at San Antonio

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-04-30
Primary Completion
2019-03-31
Completion
2019-05-31

Countries

  • United States
  • Finland
  • Germany
  • Malaysia
  • Qatar
  • Romania
  • South Africa
  • Spain
  • Ukraine

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02341443 on ClinicalTrials.gov