A Multicenter RCT to Investigate the Treatment of Double (Bilateral) Mandibular Fractures
NCT02341443 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 314
Last updated 2020-08-19
Summary
Mandibular fractures represent approximately 50% of the total facial fractures and are commonly (more than half) presented in more than one location. A few simple fractures can be treated using a conservative approach. More often, however, mandibular fractures require stabilization using open reduction and internal fixation.
Simple mandibular fractures can be treated using non-rigid fixation techniques that rely on the load-sharing principle, by which stabilization is accomplished with both fixation devices and bone surfaces. On the other hand, more complex fractures with continuity defects or comminuted need to be handle using rigid fixation where the device assumes all the forces (load-bearing principle). These approaches are well established, whereas the level of evidence for the treatment of bilateral double mandibular fractures (DMF) is still scarce. In fact, which surgical treatment, or combination of treatments, leads to the best outcome and the lowest rate of complications in bilateral DMFs is an open question.
The purpose of this study is to assess the complication rate in patients suffering from bilateral DMF treated either using non-rigid fixation on both fracture sides or a combination of rigid fixation on one side and non-rigid fixation on the other side.
Conditions
- Mandibular Fractures
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Implants
Experimental arm: Rigid Surgical treatment using arch bars and according to the following fixation: Rigid fixation on one side (most anterior fracture) and non-rigid fixation on the other (most posterior fracture). Active comparator: Non-rigid Surgical treatment using arch bars and according to the following fixation: Non-rigid fixation on both fracture sides. Whereas non-rigid fixation is defined as a single miniplate of ≤1.00 mm thickness, and rigid fixation is defined as a single plate of ≥1.25 mm thickness, a combination of 2 plates or a 3D geometric plate.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
AOCMF
collaborator OTHER -
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Risto Kontio, MD DDS PhD · Helsinki University Central Hospital
-
Edward Ellis III, DDS MS · UT Health Science Center at San Antonio
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2019-03-31
- Completion
- 2019-05-31
Countries
- United States
- Finland
- Germany
- Malaysia
- Qatar
- Romania
- South Africa
- Spain
- Ukraine
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of Implant Placement for Patients With Mandibular Reconstruction Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guides
NCT06250907 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Initial Stability of Posterior Maxillary Implants With Bicortical Fixation
NCT01237184 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation Clinical and Radiographic Images in Dental Implants Rehabilitated With Overdentures
NCT02511977 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Functional Versus Non Functional Implant Loading in the Mandible
NCT04521530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT01801566 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Bone Loss Around Mandibular Implant-retaining Overdentures and Implant Supported Fixed Hybrid Prosthesis
NCT06488599 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Evaluation of Accuracy of Patient-Specific Plate for Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture
NCT07231042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES RETAINED WITH TWO INCLINED IMPLANTS
NCT05695612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Versus Mandibular Conventional Denture
NCT03463174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peri-implant Bone Changes in Post-menopausal Osteoporotic Women
NCT02884401 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the All-on-three Concept in Mandible.
NCT06929689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Stability Using Satellite Implant for Immediate Loading in Posterior Mandible
NCT06486311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Implant Stability Changes in Sites Prepared with Different Osseodensification Techniques: a Prospective Observational Clinical Study
NCT06679894 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Survival Rate of 2 Implant-supported Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06447792 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Mandibular Overdenture Retained by 1 or 2 Implants: a Cost-effectiveness Analysis
NCT03691285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Implants and Locators for Improved Retention
NCT02551146 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Study For Minimally Invasive Splinted Implants
NCT02107612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Versus Late Placement
NCT04741607 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading of Implants in the Partially or Completely Edentulous Jaw
NCT02661412 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Impact of Buccal Bone Thickness on Pathological Peri-implant Bone Loss: A 3-year Prospective Cohort Study
NCT02939222 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdenture
NCT01064843 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Retrospective Analysis of Failures of Oral Implants
NCT02369562 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Implant Survival and Peri-abutment Tissue Reactions of Extra-oral Implants.
NCT03182361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA