MedTrace Logo

Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation

NCT02073786 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 168

Last updated 2015-02-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Lightwand is a useful alternative device for intubation but scooping movement can induce damage and microbleeding of oral mucosa, postoperative hoarseness,sore throat. Optiscope is rigid video stylet which has camera on distal tip of device. In many previous studies, rigid video stylet has proven advantages compared with other intubating devices.

Conditions

  • Hoarseness
  • Intubation
  • Sorethroat

Interventions

DEVICE

Conventional lightwand intubation

Conventional lightwand intubation technique will perform during intubation

DEVICE

Rigid video stylet

Rigid video stylet will inserted through endotracheal tube before induction. After induction with propofol and remifentanil using TIVA infusion pump, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg were used to facilitate intubation. After 2minutes, board-certificated anesthesiologist perform intubation using Optiscope.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hee Pyung Park, MD PhD · Professor

  • Eugene Kim, MD · fellow

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-10-31
Primary Completion
2015-03-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02073786 on ClinicalTrials.gov