An Implant With an Acid-etched Fixture Surface and Internal-hex Collar May Achieve Greater Osseointegration.
NCT01641198 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 58
Last updated 2020-12-17
Summary
Brånemark System® dental implant osseointegration was introduced clinically in 1965 as a novel approach to the replacement of missing teeth. Although this implant's traditional machined screw-shaped surface had excellent, well-documented short- and long-term osseointegration success, newer implant designs were introduced that could enhance biological fusion of the implant to jaw bones, allowing more rapid restoration and function. It was also claimed that such implants could lead to less bone loss with function. One such implant, Screw-Vent®, had a macrostructure very similar to that of the Brånemark implant, except that it's fixture surface was acid-etched which could enhance biological osseointegration. It also had a longer narrower smooth internal-hex interlocking flat collar that could better resist occlusal forces, leading to even less bone loss according to the manufacturer. However, no well-controlled clinical studies existed in 1990 that supported these claims. This study was undertaken, therefore, to first compare the Brånemark implant with another implant, Swede-Vent®, a copy of the Brånemark implant except for its fixture surface that was identically acid-etched as that of Screw-Vent by the same manufacturer. The effect on bone healing could then be compared between Brånemark's machined and Swede-Vent's acid-etched surfaces in the short- and long-terms. Our hypothesis was that the microtextured Swede-Vent fixture would lead to greater bone preservation. Since Screw-Vent's fixture surface was identically acid-etched as that of Swede-Vent by the same manufacturer, we could then evaluate the effect on bone healing of Screw-Vent's collar and the shorter wider machined smooth external-hex flat collar of Swede-Vent (identical to that of Brånemark). All three 2-part platform-matched parallel-wall implants were made of commercially pure titanium, had a very similar fixture macro-design, were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (USA) and Health and Welfare Canada, and were commercially available in North America. Brånemark is still available, but with an oxidized microtextured fixture surface and a shortened machined smooth external-hex flat collar. Screw-Vent is still available with its microtextured fixture surface, but its machined smooth internal-hex flat collar has also been substantially shortened. Swede-Vent is no longer available.
Conditions
- Jaw, Edentulous
- Dental Implant
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Configuration 1
B placed at sites 2 and 5, SW placed at sites 1 and 4, SC placed at site 3
- DEVICE
-
Configuration 2
B placed at site 3, SW placed at sites 2 and 5, SC placed at sites 1 and 4
- DEVICE
-
Configuration 3
B placed at sites 1 and 4, SW placed at site 3, SC placed at sites 2 and 5
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical Research Council of Canada, FRSQ, CoreVent, Université de Montréal
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Université de Montréal
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Patrice Milot, DMD,MSD · Université de Montréal
-
Hugo Ciaburro, DMD, MSc · Université de Montréal
-
Aldo-Joseph Camarda, DDS, MSc · Université de Montréal
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 56 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 1992-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 1998-03-24
- Completion
- 2013-09-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Performance of MicroTextured Dental Implants
NCT01821417 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
a Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Plaque Removal Around Dental Implants
NCT02091609 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading Of Dental Implants: A Pilot Clinical Study
NCT01644058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess Crestal Bone Remodeling of Four Different Implant Designs
NCT06821308 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SA Versus SOI Surfaces for Single Implant-supported Crown
NCT04073654 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Different Screwed Abutment Height
NCT06017115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MARGINAL BONE LEVELS AROUND IMPLANTS PLACED BY PARTIAL OR FULL-THICKNESS FLAP: A 3-YEAR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT06926101 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Osseointegration Properties of Nano-Hydroxy Apatite Coated Titanium Implant
NCT05936775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PROMs Comparing Digital & Conventional Workflows
NCT04986761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Healing of Bone/Soft Tissue to Different Abutment Biomaterials and the Impact on Marginal Bone Loss
NCT01961635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic Outcome of 3D Printed Hybrid Ceramics as Final Restorations for Single Screw Retained Implant.
NCT07154602 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation
NCT00901017 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Phenotype Modification Via GBR and ADM
NCT07082244 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Implant Surface Characteristics in Patients With History of Periodontitis
NCT05010382 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using 3.3mm Screw Tap and Cutting Resistance to Evaluate Bone Quality Around Dental Implant
NCT00172718 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
PEEK Vs Titanium for All-on-4 Prosthesis
NCT06700733 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Versus Conventional Full-arch Implant Impression in Maxillary Screw- Retained Implant Prosthesis
NCT05709236 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Survival Rate of 2 Implant-supported Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures
NCT06447792 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Milled in Versus Round Bar for Mini-implant Retained Mandibular Overdentures
NCT06185283 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Nylon Clip Wear Assessment in Implant
NCT06909435 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Comparison of Ultrasonic and Hand Instrumentation in the Maintenance of Peri-implant Tissues: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02100384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of CAD/CAM and Conventionally Fabricated Singl Implant Abutments.
NCT01229995 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA