Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00979147 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 400
Last updated 2020-09-07
Summary
This study is designed to compare prospectively, in a randomized Level 1 evidence fashion, the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of a modular polished tibial (MPT) tray with a moderately cross-linked polyethylene (XLK) insert to an all-polyethylene tibial (APT) design with GVF polyethylene. Comparing these two designs will afford us information in the following areas:
1. Does a MPT/XLK design have improved wear characteristics over a nonmodular APT/GVF design?
2. Is there a clear clinical advantage to the MPT/XLK design in certain patient populations that justify its use over the APT/GVF design?
Answering these questions will allow surgeons to use both designs appropriately in different demand populations.
This study is designed to address the questions of whether an MPT/XLK design offers improvement in wear characteristics, Knee Society scores, KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36, or radiographic measures, over an APT design. The investigator's primary hypothesis is that there will be no difference in these outcome measures at a minimum two year follow-up. A secondary hypothesis based on the long-term follow-up of this group, up to twenty years, is that there will be no difference in implant survival.
Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
TKA surgery with modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK design
TKA surgery with modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK design
- PROCEDURE
-
TKA surgery with the nonmodular APT/GVF design
TKA surgery with the nonmodular APT/GVF design
- DEVICE
-
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System with modular XLK poly
- DEVICE
-
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System
P.F.C. ® Sigma Knee System with an all-poly GVF tibia
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Depuy, Inc.
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
lead FED
Principal Investigators
-
Terence J Gioe, M.D. · Minneapolis VAMC
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 60 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2007-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2013-05-31
- Completion
- 2013-11-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Metal-backed Versus All-poly
NCT00733928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
P.F.C. Sigma Fixed Versus P.F.C. RP Mobile Bearing Total Knee Systems
NCT00208286 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Fixed Bearing vs Mobile Bearing Cruciate Retaining TKA
NCT00289094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Survivorship of the Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Fixed Bearing Knee With a Cobalt Chrome Tibial Tray
NCT00734019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Randomized Fixed Bearing vs Mobile Bearing Cruciate Substituting TKA
NCT00289107 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PFC Sigma Fixed and Mobile Knee Study
NCT00208325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
All-Polyethylene Tibias in TKA: PS vs CS Implants
NCT03569670 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patellar Resurfacing Versus Patellar Retention in Total Knee Arthroplasty - A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT01500252 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
All Polyethylene Tibia-VEGA Kiel
NCT02756702 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mechanics Analysis of Patients Having a Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA
NCT01714492 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Gamma Vacuum Foil (GVF) Versus Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty Study
NCT00289133 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Rotating Platform (RP) TC3 Revision Knee in Revision Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00733681 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Long-term Study of The Press Fit Condylar (P.F.C.) Sigma Total Knee Replacement System
NCT00734110 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Maxim® Knee Pop-Top® Tibia vs. Regular Maxim® Knee Tibia
NCT00579059 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
NCT01194817 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Personalizing MPK Prescription
NCT06399471 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Implant Design Improve Postoperative Flexion?
NCT00380861 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Function Following Partial and Total Knee Replacement
NCT00492219 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Randomized Trial Using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis of the Advance Medial Pivot Knee
NCT00405470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Functional, Gait, and Outcome Comparison Study of Medial Pivot Versus Single Radius Design for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04814082 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Performance Study of the Legion Porous System in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03720782 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of A Mobile-Bearing Total Knee System With A Fixed-Bearing Total Knee System In Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00589108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-Center Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of the LEGION Medial Stabilized (MS) Insert in Patients Undergoing a Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT07199738 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
All-poly Versus Metal-backed
NCT04358601 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Importance of Different Modularity of the Polyethylene Insert for Tibial Component Migration and Adaptive Bone Remodeling After Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Trabecular Metal Technology (TMT) Zimmer NexGen®, (Monoblock vs. Modular Design)
NCT01637051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA